CMBO vs IVV
Wayfinder Dynamic US Interest Rate ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, CMBO or IVV?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CMBO | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $3M | $896.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.94% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 6 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +3.09% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.68% | +17.54%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% |
| Fund Family | Wayfinder ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 4, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
CMBO vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CMBO vs IVV Performance
Wayfinder Dynamic US Interest Rate ETF (CMBO) is an ETF from Wayfinder ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year CMBO returned +3.68% while IVV returned +17.54%. Year to date, CMBO is up 3.09% versus a gain of 13.59% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CMBO charges 0.15% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CMBO currently yields 1.94% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in CMBO and 506 in IVV, totalling 3.5% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 65 days apart, CMBO as of Jul 28, 2026 and IVV as of Oct 1, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in CMBO and 506 in IVV, against full books of 6 and 508.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CMBO and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CMBO or IVV?
CMBO has an expense ratio of 0.15% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CMBO or IVV?
Over the past year CMBO returned +3.68% vs +17.54% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CMBO or IVV?
CMBO yields 1.94% while IVV yields 1.10%, so CMBO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than CMBO?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.