CMBO vs QQQ
Wayfinder Dynamic US Interest Rate ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, CMBO or QQQ?
QQQ has been ahead.
CMBO has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CMBO | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15%Best | 0.18% |
| AUM | $3M | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.94% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 6 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +3.09% | +19.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.68% | +22.47%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.18% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.42% |
| Fund Family | Wayfinder ETFs | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Nov 4, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
CMBO vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CMBO vs QQQ Performance
Wayfinder Dynamic US Interest Rate ETF (CMBO) is an ETF from Wayfinder ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CMBO returned +3.68% while QQQ returned +22.47%. Year to date, CMBO is up 3.09% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CMBO charges 0.15% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $18 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CMBO currently yields 1.94% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in CMBO and 101 in QQQ, totalling 3.5% and 99.6% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 65 days apart, CMBO as of Jul 28, 2026 and QQQ as of Oct 1, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in CMBO and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 6 and 321.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CMBO and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CMBO or QQQ?
CMBO has an expense ratio of 0.15% while QQQ charges 0.18%. CMBO is the cheaper option, by $3 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CMBO or QQQ?
Over the past year CMBO returned +3.68% vs +22.47% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CMBO or QQQ?
CMBO yields 1.94% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so CMBO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than CMBO?
CMBO has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.