CMBO vs VTI
Wayfinder Dynamic US Interest Rate ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, CMBO or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CMBO | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $3M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.94% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 6 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +3.09% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.68% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Fund Family | Wayfinder ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | - | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 4, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
CMBO vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
CMBO vs VTI Performance
Wayfinder Dynamic US Interest Rate ETF (CMBO) is an ETF from Wayfinder ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year CMBO returned +3.68% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, CMBO is up 3.09% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CMBO charges 0.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CMBO currently yields 1.94% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1 holding in CMBO and 3,441 in VTI, totalling 3.5% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1 positions we hold weights for in CMBO and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 6 and 3,524.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of CMBO and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CMBO or VTI?
CMBO has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, CMBO or VTI?
Over the past year CMBO returned +3.68% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, CMBO or VTI?
CMBO yields 1.94% while VTI yields 1.06%, so CMBO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than CMBO?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.