DCOR vs FLQL
Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF vs Franklin US Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF
Which is better, DCOR or FLQL?
Nearly the same fund. DCOR costs less.
DCOR has a lower expense ratio. DCOR led over 1Y, FLQL over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. DCOR is less concentrated, with 28.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DCOR | FLQL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.14%Best | 0.15% |
| AUM | $44.9B | $2.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.91% | 1.02% |
| Holdings | 2,404 | 219 |
| YTD Return | +14.72%Best | +14.13% |
| 1Y Return | +19.46%Best | +17.84% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.43% | +22.94%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.74% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.3%Best | 12.4% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.1%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $17,525 | $18,322Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 28.8%Best | 38.6% |
| Fund Family | Dimensional | Franklin Templeton Investments (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 15, 2005 | Apr 26, 2017 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 13, 2023 to Oct 13, 2026 (3.1 years).
DCOR vs FLQL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
DCOR vs FLQL Performance
Dimensional US Core Equity 1 ETF (DCOR) is an ETF from Dimensional and Franklin US Large Cap Multifactor Index ETF (FLQL) is an ETF from Franklin Templeton Investments (US). Over the past year DCOR returned +19.46% while FLQL returned +17.84%. Year to date, DCOR is up 14.72% versus a gain of 14.13% for FLQL.
Over three years, DCOR compounded at +21.43% per year against +22.94% for FLQL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FLQL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.4% compared with 12.3% for DCOR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.1% for DCOR and -19.3% for FLQL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DCOR charges 0.14% per year while FLQL charges 0.15%. On a $10,000 position that is $14 vs $15 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DCOR currently yields 0.91% against 1.02% for FLQL.
Holdings Overlap
49.0% of DCOR's money is in holdings FLQL also owns. 96.0% of FLQL's money is in holdings DCOR also owns.
Most of FLQL is already inside DCOR. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
187 positions in common, counted across the 2,394 positions we hold weights for in DCOR and 214 in FLQL, against full books of 2,404 and 219.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 23 positions for FLQL that do not appear in our book for DCOR (3.3% of the fund), and 1,117 for DCOR that do not appear in FLQL (47.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DCOR | Weight in FLQL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.03% | 7.91% | 1.88% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.80% | 7.35% | 1.55% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.44% | 5.08% | 0.64% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.00% | 3.32% | 0.32% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 1.69% | 3.57% | 1.88% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 1.54% | 2.87% | 1.33% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.10% | 2.09% | 0.01% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.59% | 2.37% | 0.78% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 1.04% | 2.09% | 1.05% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 0.77% | 1.95% | 1.18% |
96.0% of FLQL is already inside DCOR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DCOR or FLQL?
DCOR has an expense ratio of 0.14% while FLQL charges 0.15%. DCOR is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DCOR or FLQL?
Over the past year DCOR returned +19.46% vs +17.84% for FLQL, so DCOR leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DCOR or FLQL?
FLQL has been the more volatile fund at 12.4% annualized versus 12.3% for DCOR. Worst drawdown: DCOR -19.1% vs FLQL -19.3%.
Should I hold both DCOR and FLQL?
DCOR and FLQL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DCOR and FLQL?
96.0% of FLQL's money is in holdings DCOR also owns. 96.0% of FLQL's is in holdings DCOR also owns. They hold 187 positions in common, counted across the 2,394 positions we hold weights for in DCOR and 214 in FLQL.
Which pays a higher dividend, DCOR or FLQL?
DCOR yields 0.91% while FLQL yields 1.02%, so FLQL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is FLQL better than DCOR?
DCOR has a lower expense ratio. DCOR led over 1Y, FLQL over 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. DCOR is less concentrated, with 28.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.