DMXU vs EASG
Xtrackers Bloomberg Developed Markets ex US Equity ETF vs Xtrackers MSCI EAFE Selection Equity ETF
Which is better, DMXU or EASG?
Nearly the same fund. DMXU costs less.
DMXU has a lower expense ratio. EASG led over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00. DMXU is less concentrated, with 16.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 22.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DMXU | EASG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.03%Best | 0.14% |
| AUM | $65M | $68M |
| Dividend Yield | 3.87% | 3.75% |
| Holdings | 360 | 361 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.2%Tie | 16.2%Tie |
| Max Drawdown | -32.3%Tie | -32.3%Tie |
| $10,000 over 7.9 years | $19,484Tie | $19,484Tie |
| Top 10 Weight | 16.2%Best | 22.5% |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Xtrackers ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 5, 2018 | Sep 5, 2018 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 33 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. DMXU has data through Oct 14, 2026 and EASG through Sep 11, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 7.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 2, 2018 to Sep 11, 2026 (7.9 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DMXU and EASG have been equally volatile, both at 16.2% annualized.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -32.3% for DMXU and -32.3% for EASG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 1.00. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DMXU charges 0.03% per year while EASG charges 0.14%. On a $10,000 position that is $3 vs $14 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DMXU currently yields 3.87% against 3.75% for EASG.
Holdings Overlap
38.7% of DMXU's money is in holdings EASG also owns. 89.3% of EASG's money is in holdings DMXU also owns.
Most of EASG is already inside DMXU. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
255 positions in common, counted across the 624 positions we hold weights for in DMXU and 356 in EASG, against full books of 360 and 361.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1 positions for EASG that do not appear in our book for DMXU (0.3% of the fund), and 7 for DMXU that do not appear in EASG (1.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DMXU | Weight in EASG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ASML:ASAsml Holding Nv | 2.71% | 5.68% | 2.97% |
| HSBA:LNHsbc Holdings Plc | 1.25% | 3.05% | 1.80% |
| NOVN:SMNovartis Ag Ordinary Shares | 1.01% | 2.43% | 1.42% |
| AZN:LNAstraZeneca PLC | 0.90% | 2.10% | 1.20% |
| ALVG:SGAllianz SE__0 | 0.68% | 1.73% | 1.05% |
| SCHN:PASchneider Electric Se | 0.72% | 1.64% | 0.92% |
| CBA:AUCommonwealth Bank Of Australia | 0.68% | 1.67% | 0.99% |
| 8035:JPTokyo Electron Ltd. Com Stk | 0.65% | 1.35% | 0.70% |
| 8316:TKSumitomo Mitsui Financial Group, Inc. Ordinary Shares | 0.59% | 1.38% | 0.79% |
| ABBN:SMAbb Ltd | 0.59% | 1.32% | 0.73% |
89.3% of EASG is already inside DMXU.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DMXU or EASG?
DMXU has an expense ratio of 0.03% while EASG charges 0.14%. DMXU is the cheaper option, by $11 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, DMXU or EASG?
DMXU and EASG have been equally volatile, both at 16.2% annualized. Worst drawdown: DMXU -32.3% vs EASG -32.3%.
Should I hold both DMXU and EASG?
DMXU and EASG have a monthly-return correlation of 1.00, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DMXU and EASG?
89.3% of EASG's money is in holdings DMXU also owns. 89.3% of EASG's is in holdings DMXU also owns. They hold 255 positions in common, counted across the 624 positions we hold weights for in DMXU and 356 in EASG.
Which pays a higher dividend, DMXU or EASG?
DMXU yields 3.87% while EASG yields 3.75%, so DMXU currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is EASG better than DMXU?
DMXU has a lower expense ratio. EASG led over 1Y. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 1.00. DMXU is less concentrated, with 16.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 22.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.