FNGS vs VTI
MicroSectors FANG+ ETNs vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, FNGS or VTI?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FNGS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 100.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FNGS | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $631M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 10 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +22.71%Best | +13.02% |
| 1Y Return | +18.93%Best | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +35.13%Best | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +20.88%Best | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.4% | 17.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -49.0% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $25,809Best | $17,616 |
| Top 10 Weight | 100.0% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | BMO Capital Markets | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 12, 2019 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 13, 2019 to Oct 14, 2026 (6.9 years).
FNGS vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.9 years both funds cover.
FNGS vs VTI Performance
MicroSectors FANG+ ETNs (FNGS) is an ETF from BMO Capital Markets and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FNGS returned +18.93% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, FNGS is up 22.71% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, FNGS compounded at +35.13% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +20.88% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, FNGS has the edge at +31.51% annualized vs +14.78%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FNGS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.4% compared with 17.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -49.0% for FNGS and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FNGS charges 0.58% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $3 annually, a gap of $55 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FNGS currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
100.0% of FNGS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 30.9% of VTI's money is in holdings FNGS also owns.
Most of FNGS is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
10 positions in common, counted across the 10 positions we hold weights for in FNGS and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 10 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 10 and 3,441 positions we hold weights for.
VTI holds 1,146 positions FNGS does not, 66.6% of the fund.
Largest: GOOG 2.12%, TSLA 1.40%, LLY 1.33%, JPM 1.29%, BRK.B 1.23%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FNGS | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 10.29% | 6.88% | 3.41% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 9.65% | 6.30% | 3.35% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 10.08% | 5.11% | 4.97% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 9.76% | 3.41% | 6.35% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 11.08% | 1.46% | 9.62% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 9.67% | 2.70% | 6.97% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 9.97% | 2.38% | 7.59% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 10.38% | 1.70% | 8.68% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 10.34% | 0.55% | 9.79% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 8.78% | 0.46% | 8.32% |
100.0% of FNGS is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FNGS or VTI?
FNGS has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $55 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FNGS or VTI?
Over the past year FNGS returned +18.93% vs +16.63% for VTI, so FNGS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), FNGS annualized +31.51% vs +14.78% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FNGS or VTI?
FNGS has been the more volatile fund at 27.4% annualized versus 17.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: FNGS -49.0% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both FNGS and VTI?
FNGS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FNGS and VTI?
100.0% of FNGS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 30.9% of VTI's is in holdings FNGS also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 10 positions we hold weights for in FNGS and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, FNGS or VTI?
FNGS yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than FNGS?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. FNGS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 100.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.