FNGS vs VYM
MicroSectors FANG+ ETNs vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, FNGS or VYM?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. FNGS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 100.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FNGS | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.58% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $631M | $78.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 2.37% |
| Holdings | 10 | 608 |
| YTD Return | +22.71%Best | +11.83% |
| 1Y Return | +18.93%Best | +15.96% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +35.13%Best | +18.60% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +20.88%Best | +11.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 27.4% | 15.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -49.0% | -35.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $25,809Best | $17,241 |
| Top 10 Weight | 100.0% | 25.8%Best |
| Fund Family | BMO Capital Markets | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 12, 2019 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 13, 2019 to Oct 14, 2026 (6.9 years).
FNGS vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 6.9 years both funds cover.
FNGS vs VYM Performance
MicroSectors FANG+ ETNs (FNGS) is an ETF from BMO Capital Markets and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FNGS returned +18.93% while VYM returned +15.96%. Year to date, FNGS is up 22.71% versus a gain of 11.83% for VYM.
Over three years, FNGS compounded at +35.13% per year against +18.60% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +20.88% and +11.51% respectively. Across the full 7-year window we track, FNGS has the edge at +31.51% annualized vs +11.01%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FNGS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.4% compared with 15.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -49.0% for FNGS and -35.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.40. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FNGS charges 0.58% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $58 vs $4 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FNGS currently yields 0.00% against 2.37% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
10.0% of FNGS's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 6.9% of VYM's money is in holdings FNGS also owns.
FNGS and VYM share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 10 positions we hold weights for in FNGS and 602 in VYM, against full books of 10 and 608.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 10 and 602 positions we hold weights for.
VYM holds 572 positions FNGS does not, 90.9% of the fund.
Largest: JPM 3.83%, XOM 2.70%, JNJ 2.58%, ABBV 1.83%, CSCO 1.76%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in FNGS | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 9.97% | 6.94% | 3.03% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of FNGS and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FNGS or VYM?
FNGS has an expense ratio of 0.58% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $54 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, FNGS or VYM?
Over the past year FNGS returned +18.93% vs +15.96% for VYM, so FNGS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (7 years), FNGS annualized +31.51% vs +11.01% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, FNGS or VYM?
FNGS has been the more volatile fund at 27.4% annualized versus 15.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: FNGS -49.0% vs VYM -35.7%.
Should I hold both FNGS and VYM?
FNGS and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.40, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between FNGS and VYM?
10.0% of FNGS's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 6.9% of VYM's is in holdings FNGS also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 10 positions we hold weights for in FNGS and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, FNGS or VYM?
FNGS yields 0.00% while VYM yields 2.37%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than FNGS?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. FNGS led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 100.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.