GCSH vs IVV
Guggenheim Ultra Short Income ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, GCSH or IVV?
Ultrashort Term Bond against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GCSH | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $288M | $896.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.90% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 694 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +0.49% | +13.59%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +17.54% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% |
| Fund Family | Guggenheim Investments | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Ultrashort Term Bond | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 15, 2026 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
GCSH vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GCSH vs IVV Performance
Guggenheim Ultra Short Income ETF (GCSH) is an ETF from Guggenheim Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, GCSH is up 0.49% versus a gain of 13.59% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GCSH charges 0.25% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $3 annually, a gap of $22 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GCSH currently yields 0.90% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
At least 3.6% of IVV's money is in holdings GCSH also owns.
Stated as a floor: for GCSH, our book for it covers 49.2% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
IVV and GCSH share little of their money.
20 positions in common, counted across the 145 positions we hold weights for in GCSH and 506 in IVV, against full books of 694 and 508.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GCSH | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 0.41% | 1.34% | 0.93% |
| BACBank of America Corp.: Financials | 0.34% | 0.53% | 0.19% |
| MSMorgan Stanley | 0.34% | 0.34% | 0.00% |
| GSGoldman Sachs Group Inc/The | 0.07% | 0.39% | 0.32% |
| UBERUber Technologies Inc | 0.24% | 0.21% | 0.03% |
| EQIXEquinix Inc. Real Estate Investment Trust | 0.24% | 0.15% | 0.09% |
| PWRQuanta Services Inc | 0.24% | 0.15% | 0.09% |
| ARESAres Management Corp A | 0.34% | 0.04% | 0.30% |
| AREAlexandria Real Estate Equities Inc. | 0.27% | 0.01% | 0.26% |
| FIFiserv, Inc. (United States) | 0.24% | 0.04% | 0.20% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GCSH and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GCSH or IVV?
GCSH has an expense ratio of 0.25% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $22 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between GCSH and IVV?
At least 3.6% of IVV's money is in holdings GCSH also owns. Our book for GCSH is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 20 positions in common, counted across the 145 positions we hold weights for in GCSH and 506 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, GCSH or IVV?
GCSH yields 0.90% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than GCSH?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.