GCSH vs QQQ
Guggenheim Ultra Short Income ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, GCSH or QQQ?
Ultrashort Term Bond against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GCSH | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.25% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $288M | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.90% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 694 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +0.49% | +19.30%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +22.47% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.18% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.42% |
| Fund Family | Guggenheim Investments | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity |
| Style | Ultrashort Term Bond | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 15, 2026 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
GCSH vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GCSH vs QQQ Performance
Guggenheim Ultra Short Income ETF (GCSH) is an ETF from Guggenheim Investments and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, GCSH is up 0.49% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GCSH charges 0.25% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $25 vs $18 annually, a gap of $7 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GCSH currently yields 0.90% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.3% of QQQ's money is in holdings GCSH also owns.
Stated as a floor: for GCSH, our book for it covers 49.2% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 145 positions we hold weights for in GCSH and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 694 and 321.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GCSH | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WBDWarner Bros. Discovery, Inc | 0.06% | 0.32% | 0.26% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GCSH and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GCSH or QQQ?
GCSH has an expense ratio of 0.25% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $7 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, GCSH or QQQ?
GCSH yields 0.90% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so GCSH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than GCSH?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.