GUSH vs QQQ
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exp. & Prod. Bull 2X ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, GUSH or QQQ?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. GUSH led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. GUSH is less concentrated, with 42.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GUSH | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.93% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $243M | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.18% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 120 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +116.53%Best | +19.30% |
| 1Y Return | +123.83%Best | +22.47% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +9.12% | +26.18%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.24% | +15.42%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 102.4% | 18.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | - | -35.1% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,458 | $20,484Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 42.2%Best | 46.7% |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | May 28, 2015 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 29, 2015 to Oct 14, 2026 (11.4 years).
GUSH vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.4 years both funds cover.
GUSH vs QQQ Performance
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exp. & Prod. Bull 2X ETF (GUSH) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year GUSH returned +123.83% while QQQ returned +22.47%. Year to date, GUSH is up 116.53% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.
Over three years, GUSH compounded at +9.12% per year against +26.18% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +14.24% and +15.42% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +18.42% annualized vs -40.54%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
GUSH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 102.4% compared with 18.8% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.34. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GUSH charges 0.93% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $93 vs $18 annually, a gap of $75 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GUSH currently yields 1.18% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
2.0% of GUSH's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 0.2% of QQQ's money is in holdings GUSH also owns.
GUSH and QQQ share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in GUSH and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 120 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 92 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for GUSH (96.1% of the fund), and 52 for GUSH that do not appear in QQQ (99.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in GUSH | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FANGDiamondback Energy Inc - Common | 1.96% | 0.21% | 1.75% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GUSH and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GUSH or QQQ?
GUSH has an expense ratio of 0.93% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $75 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, GUSH or QQQ?
Over the past year GUSH returned +123.83% vs +22.47% for QQQ, so GUSH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), GUSH annualized -40.54% vs +18.42% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, GUSH or QQQ?
GUSH has been the more volatile fund at 102.4% annualized versus 18.8% for QQQ.
Should I hold both GUSH and QQQ?
GUSH and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.34, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between GUSH and QQQ?
2.0% of GUSH's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 0.2% of QQQ's is in holdings GUSH also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in GUSH and 101 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, GUSH or QQQ?
GUSH yields 1.18% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so GUSH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than GUSH?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. GUSH led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. GUSH is less concentrated, with 42.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.