GUSH vs VYM

GUSH vs VYM

Which is better, GUSH or VYM?

Multi Alternative against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. GUSH led over 1Y and 5Y, VYM over 3Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.2%.

Lower Fees: VYMHigher Returns: splitLess Concentrated: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGUSHVYM
Expense Ratio0.93%0.04%Best
AUM$243M$78.9B
Dividend Yield1.18%2.37%
Holdings120608
YTD Return+116.53%Best+11.83%
1Y Return+123.83%Best+15.96%
3Y Return (annualized)+9.12%+18.60%Best
5Y Return (annualized)+14.24%Best+11.51%
Volatility (annualized)102.4%14.0%Best
Max Drawdown--35.7%
$10,000 over 5 years$19,458Best$17,241
Top 10 Weight42.2%25.8%Best
Fund FamilyDirexion Shares ETF TrustVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleMulti AlternativeLarge Cap Value
InceptionMay 28, 2015Nov 10, 2006

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 29, 2015 to Oct 14, 2026 (11.4 years).

GUSH vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 11.4 years both funds cover.

GUSH vs VYM Performance

Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exp. & Prod. Bull 2X ETF (GUSH) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year GUSH returned +123.83% while VYM returned +15.96%. Year to date, GUSH is up 116.53% versus a gain of 11.83% for VYM.

Over three years, GUSH compounded at +9.12% per year against +18.60% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +14.24% and +11.51% respectively. Across the full 11-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +9.09% annualized vs -40.54%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

GUSH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 102.4% compared with 14.0% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GUSH charges 0.93% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $93 vs $4 annually, a gap of $89 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GUSH currently yields 1.18% against 2.37% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

GUSH already in VYM55.6%
VYM already in GUSH7.8%

55.6% of GUSH's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 7.8% of VYM's money is in holdings GUSH also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

28 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in GUSH and 602 in VYM, against full books of 120 and 608.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 545 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for GUSH (90.1% of the fund), and 25 for GUSH that do not appear in VYM (45.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in GUSHWeight in VYMDifference
XOMExxonmobil Corp.2.15%2.70%0.55%
CVXChevron Corp2.08%1.54%0.54%
MPCMarathon Petroleum Corp2.27%0.44%1.83%
VLOValero Energy2.24%0.43%1.81%
COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.011.99%0.65%1.34%
PSXPhillips 662.18%0.40%1.78%
EOGEog Resources Inc2.07%0.31%1.76%
DINOHollyfrontier2.25%0.06%2.19%
DVNDevon Energy Corp.2.09%0.22%1.87%
PBFPbf Energy Inc2.27%0.03%2.24%

55.6% of GUSH is already inside VYM.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

GUSHVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GUSH or VYM?

GUSH has an expense ratio of 0.93% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $89 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, GUSH or VYM?

Over the past year GUSH returned +123.83% vs +15.96% for VYM, so GUSH leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (11 years), GUSH annualized -40.54% vs +9.09% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, GUSH or VYM?

GUSH has been the more volatile fund at 102.4% annualized versus 14.0% for VYM.

Should I hold both GUSH and VYM?

GUSH and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between GUSH and VYM?

55.6% of GUSH's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 7.8% of VYM's is in holdings GUSH also owns. They hold 28 positions in common, counted across the 53 positions we hold weights for in GUSH and 602 in VYM.

Which pays a higher dividend, GUSH or VYM?

GUSH yields 1.18% while VYM yields 2.37%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than GUSH?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. GUSH led over 1Y and 5Y, VYM over 3Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 42.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.