JVAL vs LVDS
JPMorgan US Value Factor ETF vs JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF
Which is better, JVAL or LVDS?
Each has led over a different period.
JVAL has a lower expense ratio. JVAL led over the full window, LVDS over 1Y. JVAL is less concentrated, with 18.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 30.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | JVAL | LVDS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.12%Best | 0.30% |
| AUM | $1.0B | $114M |
| Dividend Yield | 1.61% | 7.56% |
| Holdings | 797 | 133 |
| YTD Return | +18.89% | +20.52%Best |
| 1Y Return | +24.99% | +25.95%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.18% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.28% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.3% | 10.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -8.5% | -6.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.3 years | $13,349Best | $13,088 |
| Top 10 Weight | 18.6%Best | 30.3% |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | J.P. Morgan Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 8, 2017 | Jul 11, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Jul 14, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.3 years).
JVAL vs LVDS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.3 years both funds cover.
JVAL vs LVDS Performance
JPMorgan US Value Factor ETF (JVAL) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management. Over the past year JVAL returned +24.99% while LVDS returned +25.95%. Year to date, JVAL is up 18.89% versus a gain of 20.52% for LVDS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
JVAL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.3% compared with 10.6% for LVDS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.5% for JVAL and -6.6% for LVDS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
JVAL charges 0.12% per year while LVDS charges 0.30%. On a $10,000 position that is $12 vs $30 annually, a gap of $18 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, JVAL currently yields 1.61% against 7.56% for LVDS.
Holdings Overlap
29.1% of JVAL's money is in holdings LVDS also owns. 42.8% of LVDS's money is in holdings JVAL also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
60 positions in common, counted across the 393 positions we hold weights for in JVAL and 131 in LVDS, against full books of 797 and 133.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 71 positions for LVDS that do not appear in our book for JVAL (56.5% of the fund), and 324 for JVAL that do not appear in LVDS (69.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in JVAL | Weight in LVDS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.12% | 5.92% | 3.80% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 2.15% | 5.39% | 3.24% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 2.43% | 1.29% | 1.14% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 1.63% | 1.45% | 0.18% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.17% | 0.49% | 1.68% |
| VZVerizon Communic | 0.42% | 1.82% | 1.40% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 0.74% | 1.26% | 0.52% |
| UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated | 0.53% | 1.13% | 0.60% |
| HPEHewlett Packard Enterprise Co | 0.48% | 1.01% | 0.53% |
| RTXRaytheon Co. | 0.17% | 1.32% | 1.15% |
42.8% of LVDS is already inside JVAL.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, JVAL or LVDS?
JVAL has an expense ratio of 0.12% while LVDS charges 0.30%. JVAL is the cheaper option, by $18 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, JVAL or LVDS?
Over the past year JVAL returned +24.99% vs +25.95% for LVDS, so LVDS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), JVAL annualized +24.88% vs +23.00% for LVDS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, JVAL or LVDS?
JVAL has been the more volatile fund at 12.3% annualized versus 10.6% for LVDS. Worst drawdown: JVAL -8.5% vs LVDS -6.6%.
Should I hold both JVAL and LVDS?
JVAL and LVDS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between JVAL and LVDS?
42.8% of LVDS's money is in holdings JVAL also owns. 42.8% of LVDS's is in holdings JVAL also owns. They hold 60 positions in common, counted across the 393 positions we hold weights for in JVAL and 131 in LVDS.
Which pays a higher dividend, JVAL or LVDS?
JVAL yields 1.61% while LVDS yields 7.56%, so LVDS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LVDS better than JVAL?
JVAL has a lower expense ratio. JVAL led over the full window, LVDS over 1Y. JVAL is less concentrated, with 18.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 30.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.