KEAT vs SPY

KEAT vs SPY

Which is better, KEAT or SPY?

SPY has been ahead.

SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y and the full window. SPY is less concentrated, with 38.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 68.9%.

Lower Fees: SPYHigher Returns: SPYLess Concentrated: SPY

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricKEATSPY
Expense Ratio0.85%0.09%Best
AUM$119M$823.2B
Dividend Yield2.82%0.99%
Holdings601,515
YTD Return+9.17%+13.53%Best
1Y Return+14.84%+17.47%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-+22.36%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.21%
Volatility (annualized)12.4%11.9%Best
Max Drawdown-10.6%Best-18.8%
$10,000 over 2.5 years$13,721$15,023Best
Top 10 Weight68.9%38.2%Best
Fund FamilyKeating Investment CounselorsState Street Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMar 27, 2024Jan 22, 1993

Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 27, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.5 years).

KEAT vs SPY growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.

KEAT vs SPY Performance

Keating Active ETF (KEAT) is an ETF from Keating Investment Counselors and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Over the past year KEAT returned +14.84% while SPY returned +17.47%. Year to date, KEAT is up 9.17% versus a gain of 13.53% for SPY.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

KEAT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.4% compared with 11.9% for SPY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.6% for KEAT and -18.8% for SPY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.17. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

KEAT charges 0.85% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $9 annually, a gap of $76 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KEAT currently yields 2.82% against 0.99% for SPY.

Holdings Overlap

KEAT already in SPY10.7%
SPY already in KEAT1.1%

10.7% of KEAT's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 1.1% of SPY's money is in holdings KEAT also owns.

KEAT and SPY share little of their money.

6 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in KEAT and 504 in SPY, against full books of 60 and 1,515.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 490 positions for SPY that do not appear in our book for KEAT (98.0% of the fund), and 10 for KEAT that do not appear in SPY (55.1%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in KEATWeight in SPYDifference
VZVerizon Communic3.48%0.33%3.15%
LMTLockheed Martin2.68%0.16%2.52%
TAPMolson Coors Brewing Co. Class B2.61%0.01%2.60%
PMPhilip Morris International Inc.1.10%0.46%0.64%
UPSUnited Parcel Service, Inc0.50%0.12%0.38%
WYWeyerhaeuser Co.0.35%0.02%0.33%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of KEAT and SPY you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

KEATSPY

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, KEAT or SPY?

KEAT has an expense ratio of 0.85% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $76 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, KEAT or SPY?

Over the past year KEAT returned +14.84% vs +17.47% for SPY, so SPY leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, KEAT or SPY?

KEAT has been the more volatile fund at 12.4% annualized versus 11.9% for SPY. Worst drawdown: KEAT -10.6% vs SPY -18.8%.

Should I hold both KEAT and SPY?

KEAT and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.17, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between KEAT and SPY?

10.7% of KEAT's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 1.1% of SPY's is in holdings KEAT also owns. They hold 6 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in KEAT and 504 in SPY.

Which pays a higher dividend, KEAT or SPY?

KEAT yields 2.82% while SPY yields 0.99%, so KEAT currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SPY better than KEAT?

SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY led over 1Y and the full window. SPY is less concentrated, with 38.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 68.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.