KEAT vs VTI
Keating Active ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, KEAT or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 68.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | KEAT | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $119M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.82% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 60 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +9.17% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +14.84% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.4% | 12.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -10.6%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 2.5 years | $13,721 | $14,845Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 68.9% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Keating Investment Counselors | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 27, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 27, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.5 years).
KEAT vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.5 years both funds cover.
KEAT vs VTI Performance
Keating Active ETF (KEAT) is an ETF from Keating Investment Counselors and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year KEAT returned +14.84% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, KEAT is up 9.17% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
KEAT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.4% compared with 12.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -10.6% for KEAT and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.19. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
KEAT charges 0.85% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, KEAT currently yields 2.82% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
22.1% of KEAT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.0% of VTI's money is in holdings KEAT also owns.
KEAT and VTI share little of their money.
10 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in KEAT and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 60 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,148 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for KEAT (96.6% of the fund), and 6 for KEAT that do not appear in VTI (43.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in KEAT | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| OIIOceaneering International Inc | 5.03% | 0.01% | 5.02% |
| TALOTalos Energy Inc | 3.90% | 0.00% | 3.90% |
| VZVerizon Communic | 3.48% | 0.25% | 3.23% |
| LMTLockheed Martin | 2.68% | 0.18% | 2.50% |
| TAPMolson Coors Brewing Co. Class B | 2.61% | 0.01% | 2.60% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 1.10% | 0.40% | 0.70% |
| LWLambwestonholdings Inc. | 1.34% | 0.01% | 1.33% |
| CALMCal-maine Foods Inc | 1.06% | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| UPSUnited Parcel Service, Inc | 0.50% | 0.11% | 0.39% |
| WYWeyerhaeuser Co. | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.33% |
22.1% of KEAT is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, KEAT or VTI?
KEAT has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, KEAT or VTI?
Over the past year KEAT returned +14.84% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, KEAT or VTI?
KEAT has been the more volatile fund at 12.4% annualized versus 12.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: KEAT -10.6% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both KEAT and VTI?
KEAT and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.19, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between KEAT and VTI?
22.1% of KEAT's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.0% of VTI's is in holdings KEAT also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in KEAT and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, KEAT or VTI?
KEAT yields 2.82% while VTI yields 1.06%, so KEAT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than KEAT?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 68.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.