LGCF vs SPY
Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust
Which is better, LGCF or SPY?
Each has led over a different period.
SPY has a lower expense ratio. LGCF led over 1Y, SPY over the full window. SPY is less concentrated, with 38.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LGCF | SPY |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.09%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $823.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.67% | 0.99% |
| Holdings | 77 | 1,515 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.2%Best | 11.8% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.7%Best | -18.8% |
| $10,000 over 2.8 years | $15,899 | $17,136Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.5% | 38.2%Best |
| Fund Family | Themes ETFs | State Street Investment Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2023 | Jan 22, 1993 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 23 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. LGCF has data through Sep 21, 2026 and SPY through Oct 14, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 13, 2023 to Sep 21, 2026 (2.8 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SPY has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 11.8% compared with 10.2% for LGCF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.7% for LGCF and -18.8% for SPY. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LGCF charges 0.29% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $9 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LGCF currently yields 1.67% against 0.99% for SPY.
Holdings Overlap
94.7% of LGCF's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 10.0% of SPY's money is in holdings LGCF also owns.
Most of LGCF is already inside SPY. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
68 positions in common, counted across the 76 positions we hold weights for in LGCF and 504 in SPY, against full books of 77 and 1,515.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 428 positions for SPY that do not appear in our book for LGCF (89.0% of the fund), and 6 for LGCF that do not appear in SPY (4.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LGCF | Weight in SPY | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 5.45% | 1.04% | 4.41% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 5.79% | 0.60% | 5.19% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 4.94% | 1.43% | 3.51% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 4.71% | 0.70% | 4.01% |
| GSGoldman Sachs Group Inc/The | 4.51% | 0.44% | 4.07% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 3.36% | 0.28% | 3.08% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 3.28% | 0.29% | 2.99% |
| AXPAmerican Express Co. | 3.23% | 0.27% | 2.96% |
| UBERUber Technologies Inc | 2.75% | 0.22% | 2.53% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 2.49% | 0.20% | 2.29% |
94.7% of LGCF is already inside SPY.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LGCF or SPY?
LGCF has an expense ratio of 0.29% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, LGCF or SPY?
SPY has been the more volatile fund at 11.8% annualized versus 10.2% for LGCF. Worst drawdown: LGCF -16.7% vs SPY -18.8%.
Should I hold both LGCF and SPY?
LGCF and SPY have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LGCF and SPY?
94.7% of LGCF's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 10.0% of SPY's is in holdings LGCF also owns. They hold 68 positions in common, counted across the 76 positions we hold weights for in LGCF and 504 in SPY.
Which pays a higher dividend, LGCF or SPY?
LGCF yields 1.67% while SPY yields 0.99%, so LGCF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SPY better than LGCF?
SPY has a lower expense ratio. LGCF led over 1Y, SPY over the full window. SPY is less concentrated, with 38.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.