LGCF vs VTI
Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, LGCF or VTI?
Each has led over a different period.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. LGCF led over 1Y, VTI over the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LGCF | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $2M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.67% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 77 | 3,524 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 10.2%Best | 12.0% |
| Max Drawdown | -16.7%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 2.8 years | $15,899 | $16,947Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.5% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Themes ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 23 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. LGCF has data through Sep 21, 2026 and VTI through Oct 14, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.8 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 13, 2023 to Sep 21, 2026 (2.8 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.0% compared with 10.2% for LGCF. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.7% for LGCF and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LGCF charges 0.29% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $3 annually, a gap of $26 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LGCF currently yields 1.67% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
97.0% of LGCF's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 9.0% of VTI's money is in holdings LGCF also owns.
Most of LGCF is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
72 positions in common, counted across the 76 positions we hold weights for in LGCF and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 77 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,084 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for LGCF (88.6% of the fund), and 2 for LGCF that do not appear in VTI (2.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LGCF | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 5.45% | 0.90% | 4.55% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 5.79% | 0.53% | 5.26% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 4.94% | 1.29% | 3.65% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 4.71% | 0.61% | 4.10% |
| GSGoldman Sachs Group Inc/The | 4.51% | 0.38% | 4.13% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 3.36% | 0.25% | 3.11% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 3.28% | 0.24% | 3.04% |
| AXPAmerican Express Co. | 3.23% | 0.24% | 2.99% |
| UBERUber Technologies Inc | 2.75% | 0.21% | 2.54% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 2.49% | 0.18% | 2.31% |
97.0% of LGCF is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LGCF or VTI?
LGCF has an expense ratio of 0.29% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $26 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, LGCF or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 12.0% annualized versus 10.2% for LGCF. Worst drawdown: LGCF -16.7% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both LGCF and VTI?
LGCF and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LGCF and VTI?
97.0% of LGCF's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 9.0% of VTI's is in holdings LGCF also owns. They hold 72 positions in common, counted across the 76 positions we hold weights for in LGCF and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, LGCF or VTI?
LGCF yields 1.67% while VTI yields 1.06%, so LGCF currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than LGCF?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. LGCF led over 1Y, VTI over the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 40.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.