LINT vs QQQ
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, LINT or QQQ?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. LINT led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LINT | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.97% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $64M | $506.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.80% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 20 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +241.32%Best | +19.30% |
| 1Y Return | +308.21%Best | +22.47% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +26.18% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.42% |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Nov 19, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
LINT vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
LINT vs QQQ Performance
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X ETF (LINT) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year LINT returned +308.21% while QQQ returned +22.47%. Year to date, LINT is up 241.32% versus a gain of 19.30% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LINT charges 0.97% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $97 vs $18 annually, a gap of $79 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LINT currently yields 0.80% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
At least 2.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings LINT also owns.
Stated as a floor: for LINT, our book for it covers 86.9% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
QQQ and LINT share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 4 positions we hold weights for in LINT and 101 in QQQ, against full books of 20 and 321.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LINT | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| INTCIntel Corporation | 17.86% | 2.64% | 15.22% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of LINT and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LINT or QQQ?
LINT has an expense ratio of 0.97% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $79 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LINT or QQQ?
Over the past year LINT returned +308.21% vs +22.47% for QQQ, so LINT leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between LINT and QQQ?
At least 2.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings LINT also owns. Our book for LINT is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 4 positions we hold weights for in LINT and 101 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, LINT or QQQ?
LINT yields 0.80% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so LINT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than LINT?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. LINT led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.