LINT vs VTI
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, LINT or VTI?
Trading-Leveraged Equity against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. LINT led over 1Y.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | LINT | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.97% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $64M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.80% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 20 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +241.32%Best | +13.02% |
| 1Y Return | +308.21%Best | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Fund Family | Direxion Shares ETF Trust | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Trading-Leveraged Equity | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 19, 2025 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
LINT vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
LINT vs VTI Performance
Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X ETF (LINT) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year LINT returned +308.21% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, LINT is up 241.32% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
LINT charges 0.97% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $97 vs $3 annually, a gap of $94 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, LINT currently yields 0.80% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 0.5% of VTI's money is in holdings LINT also owns.
Stated as a floor: for LINT, our book for it covers 86.9% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 4 positions we hold weights for in LINT and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 20 and 3,524.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in LINT | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| INTCIntel Corporation | 17.86% | 0.51% | 17.35% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of LINT and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, LINT or VTI?
LINT has an expense ratio of 0.97% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $94 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, LINT or VTI?
Over the past year LINT returned +308.21% vs +16.63% for VTI, so LINT leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, LINT or VTI?
LINT yields 0.80% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than LINT?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. LINT led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.