MAVF vs PJFV
Matrix Advisors Value ETF vs PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF
Which is better, MAVF or PJFV?
PJFV has been ahead.
PJFV has a lower expense ratio. PJFV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. PJFV is less concentrated, with 41.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MAVF | PJFV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.33%Best |
| AUM | $93M | $183M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.37% | 0.57% |
| Holdings | 29 | 37 |
| YTD Return | +13.01% | +20.68%Best |
| 1Y Return | +19.46% | +27.75%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +24.90% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.3% | 12.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.4%Best | -16.8% |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $13,491 | $13,967Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 54.6% | 41.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Matrix Asset Advisors | PGIM Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 16, 1983 | Dec 12, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.6 years).
MAVF vs PJFV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
MAVF vs PJFV Performance
Matrix Advisors Value ETF (MAVF) is an ETF from Matrix Asset Advisors and PGIM Jennison Focused Value ETF (PJFV) is an ETF from PGIM Investments. Over the past year MAVF returned +19.46% while PJFV returned +27.75%. Year to date, MAVF is up 13.01% versus a gain of 20.68% for PJFV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MAVF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.3% compared with 12.0% for PJFV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.4% for MAVF and -16.8% for PJFV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MAVF charges 0.75% per year while PJFV charges 0.33%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $33 annually, a gap of $42 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MAVF currently yields 0.37% against 0.57% for PJFV.
Holdings Overlap
45.1% of MAVF's money is in holdings PJFV also owns. 35.0% of PJFV's money is in holdings MAVF also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
10 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in MAVF and 35 in PJFV, against full books of 29 and 37.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 27 and 35 positions we hold weights for.
PJFV holds 21 positions MAVF does not, 54.0% of the fund.
Largest: XOM 4.01%, SHEL 3.55%, WMT 3.41%, TOL 3.20%, GOOGL 3.03%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MAVF | Weight in PJFV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 8.61% | 6.30% | 2.31% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.06% | 5.66% | 1.40% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 6.38% | 4.67% | 1.71% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 5.73% | 2.38% | 3.35% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 3.19% | 4.28% | 1.09% |
| WFCWells Fargo & Co. | 3.34% | 2.69% | 0.65% |
| PNCPnc Financial Services Group Inc. | 3.05% | 2.71% | 0.34% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 3.27% | 2.01% | 1.26% |
| GSGoldman Sachs Group Inc/The | 2.47% | 2.07% | 0.40% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 1.97% | 2.19% | 0.22% |
45.1% of MAVF is already inside PJFV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MAVF or PJFV?
MAVF has an expense ratio of 0.75% while PJFV charges 0.33%. PJFV is the cheaper option, by $42 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MAVF or PJFV?
Over the past year MAVF returned +19.46% vs +27.75% for PJFV, so PJFV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MAVF annualized +20.58% vs +23.22% for PJFV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MAVF or PJFV?
MAVF has been the more volatile fund at 14.3% annualized versus 12.0% for PJFV. Worst drawdown: MAVF -16.4% vs PJFV -16.8%.
Should I hold both MAVF and PJFV?
MAVF and PJFV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MAVF and PJFV?
45.1% of MAVF's money is in holdings PJFV also owns. 35.0% of PJFV's is in holdings MAVF also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in MAVF and 35 in PJFV.
Which pays a higher dividend, MAVF or PJFV?
MAVF yields 0.37% while PJFV yields 0.57%, so PJFV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PJFV better than MAVF?
PJFV has a lower expense ratio. PJFV led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. PJFV is less concentrated, with 41.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.