MAVF vs PVAL
Matrix Advisors Value ETF vs Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF
Which is better, MAVF or PVAL?
PVAL has been ahead.
PVAL has a lower expense ratio. PVAL led over 1Y and the full window. PVAL is less concentrated, with 42.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MAVF | PVAL |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.55%Best |
| AUM | $93M | $14.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.37% | 0.92% |
| Holdings | 29 | 93 |
| YTD Return | +13.01% | +17.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | +19.46% | +27.77%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +24.11% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.54% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.3% | 10.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.4% | -13.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $13,491 | $14,112Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 54.6% | 42.7%Best |
| Fund Family | Matrix Asset Advisors | Putnam Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 16, 1983 | May 25, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.6 years).
MAVF vs PVAL growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
MAVF vs PVAL Performance
Matrix Advisors Value ETF (MAVF) is an ETF from Matrix Asset Advisors and Putnam Focused Large Cap Value ETF (PVAL) is an ETF from Putnam Investments. Over the past year MAVF returned +19.46% while PVAL returned +27.77%. Year to date, MAVF is up 13.01% versus a gain of 17.95% for PVAL.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MAVF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.3% compared with 10.1% for PVAL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.4% for MAVF and -13.6% for PVAL. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MAVF charges 0.75% per year while PVAL charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $55 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MAVF currently yields 0.37% against 0.92% for PVAL.
Holdings Overlap
27.2% of MAVF's money is in holdings PVAL also owns. 24.1% of PVAL's money is in holdings MAVF also owns.
MAVF and PVAL share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in MAVF and 45 in PVAL, against full books of 29 and 93.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 27 and 45 positions we hold weights for.
PVAL holds 37 positions MAVF does not, 72.2% of the fund.
Largest: XOM 3.76%, C 3.24%, SCHW 3.24%, FCX 3.12%, KO 2.94%
27.2% of MAVF is already inside PVAL.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MAVF or PVAL?
MAVF has an expense ratio of 0.75% while PVAL charges 0.55%. PVAL is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MAVF or PVAL?
Over the past year MAVF returned +19.46% vs +27.77% for PVAL, so PVAL leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MAVF annualized +20.58% vs +24.02% for PVAL. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MAVF or PVAL?
MAVF has been the more volatile fund at 14.3% annualized versus 10.1% for PVAL. Worst drawdown: MAVF -16.4% vs PVAL -13.6%.
Should I hold both MAVF and PVAL?
MAVF and PVAL have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MAVF and PVAL?
27.2% of MAVF's money is in holdings PVAL also owns. 24.1% of PVAL's is in holdings MAVF also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in MAVF and 45 in PVAL.
Which pays a higher dividend, MAVF or PVAL?
MAVF yields 0.37% while PVAL yields 0.92%, so PVAL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PVAL better than MAVF?
PVAL has a lower expense ratio. PVAL led over 1Y and the full window. PVAL is less concentrated, with 42.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.