MAVF vs REVS
Matrix Advisors Value ETF vs Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF
Which is better, MAVF or REVS?
Each has led over a different period.
REVS has a lower expense ratio. MAVF led over the full window, REVS over 1Y. REVS is less concentrated, with 33.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | MAVF | REVS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.19%Best |
| AUM | $93M | $370M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.37% | 1.84% |
| Holdings | 29 | 611 |
| YTD Return | +13.01% | +18.22%Best |
| 1Y Return | +19.46% | +23.33%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +20.60% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.45% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.3% | 10.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -16.4% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.6 years | $13,491Best | $13,254 |
| Top 10 Weight | 54.6% | 33.6%Best |
| Fund Family | Matrix Asset Advisors | Columbia Threadneedle Investments |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Sep 16, 1983 | Sep 25, 2019 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.6 years).
MAVF vs REVS growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.6 years both funds cover.
MAVF vs REVS Performance
Matrix Advisors Value ETF (MAVF) is an ETF from Matrix Asset Advisors and Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF (REVS) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments. Over the past year MAVF returned +19.46% while REVS returned +23.33%. Year to date, MAVF is up 13.01% versus a gain of 18.22% for REVS.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
MAVF has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.3% compared with 10.7% for REVS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -16.4% for MAVF and -14.5% for REVS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.84. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
MAVF charges 0.75% per year while REVS charges 0.19%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $19 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, MAVF currently yields 0.37% against 1.84% for REVS.
Holdings Overlap
34.3% of MAVF's money is in holdings REVS also owns. 20.8% of REVS's money is in holdings MAVF also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
8 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in MAVF and 298 in REVS, against full books of 29 and 611.
What only one of them owns
Measured across the 27 and 298 positions we hold weights for.
REVS holds 276 positions MAVF does not, 77.0% of the fund.
Largest: BAC 3.84%, CVX 2.92%, MO 2.21%, C 1.96%, BMY 1.72%
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in MAVF | Weight in REVS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 8.61% | 7.16% | 1.45% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.06% | 8.48% | 1.42% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 5.73% | 2.05% | 3.68% |
| USBUS Bancorp | 2.87% | 0.96% | 1.91% |
| TSNTyson Foods Inc. Class A | 3.22% | 0.29% | 2.93% |
| BKBank Of New York Mellon Corp | 2.03% | 1.07% | 0.96% |
| CMCSAComcast Corp. Class A | 2.26% | 0.66% | 1.60% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 2.54% | 0.15% | 2.39% |
34.3% of MAVF is already inside REVS.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, MAVF or REVS?
MAVF has an expense ratio of 0.75% while REVS charges 0.19%. REVS is the cheaper option, by $56 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, MAVF or REVS?
Over the past year MAVF returned +19.46% vs +23.33% for REVS, so REVS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), MAVF annualized +20.58% vs +19.25% for REVS. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, MAVF or REVS?
MAVF has been the more volatile fund at 14.3% annualized versus 10.7% for REVS. Worst drawdown: MAVF -16.4% vs REVS -14.5%.
Should I hold both MAVF and REVS?
MAVF and REVS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.84, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between MAVF and REVS?
34.3% of MAVF's money is in holdings REVS also owns. 20.8% of REVS's is in holdings MAVF also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 27 positions we hold weights for in MAVF and 298 in REVS.
Which pays a higher dividend, MAVF or REVS?
MAVF yields 0.37% while REVS yields 1.84%, so REVS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is REVS better than MAVF?
REVS has a lower expense ratio. MAVF led over the full window, REVS over 1Y. REVS is less concentrated, with 33.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 54.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.