NTKI vs OMFS
Nationwide Russell 2000 Risk-Managed Income ETF vs Invesco Russell 2000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Which is better, NTKI or OMFS?
OMFS has been ahead.
OMFS has a lower expense ratio. OMFS led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | NTKI | OMFS |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.70% | 0.39%Best |
| AUM | $12M | $264M |
| Dividend Yield | 6.01% | 1.30% |
| Holdings | 13 | 2,228 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.2%Best | 21.2% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.9%Best | -24.6% |
| $10,000 over 2.9 years | $8,811 | $10,169Best |
| Fund Family | Nationwide | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 16, 2021 | Nov 8, 2017 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 712 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. NTKI has data through Nov 1, 2024 and OMFS through Oct 14, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 17, 2021 to Nov 1, 2024 (2.9 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OMFS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.2% compared with 11.2% for NTKI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.9% for NTKI and -24.6% for OMFS. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.83. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
NTKI charges 0.70% per year while OMFS charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $70 vs $39 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, NTKI currently yields 6.01% against 1.30% for OMFS.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of NTKI and OMFS you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, NTKI or OMFS?
NTKI has an expense ratio of 0.70% while OMFS charges 0.39%. OMFS is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, NTKI or OMFS?
OMFS has been the more volatile fund at 21.2% annualized versus 11.2% for NTKI. Worst drawdown: NTKI -19.9% vs OMFS -24.6%.
Should I hold both NTKI and OMFS?
NTKI and OMFS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.83, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, NTKI or OMFS?
NTKI yields 6.01% while OMFS yields 1.30%, so NTKI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is OMFS better than NTKI?
OMFS has a lower expense ratio. OMFS led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.