OALC vs VOO
OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, OALC or VOO?
Nearly the same fund. VOO costs less.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. OALC led over 1Y and 3Y, VOO over 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. OALC is less concentrated, with 34.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OALC | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $280M | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 0.52% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 424 | 506 |
| YTD Return | +16.12%Best | +13.57% |
| 1Y Return | +19.96%Best | +17.55% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.66%Best | +22.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +11.01% | +13.28%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.3%Best | 15.6% |
| Max Drawdown | -26.8% | -24.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $16,858 | $18,654Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 34.0%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | OneAscent Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 15, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 16, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (4.9 years).
OALC vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.9 years both funds cover.
OALC vs VOO Performance
OneAscent Large Cap Core ETF (OALC) is an ETF from OneAscent Investments and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year OALC returned +19.96% while VOO returned +17.55%. Year to date, OALC is up 16.12% versus a gain of 13.57% for VOO.
Over three years, OALC compounded at +22.66% per year against +22.46% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +11.01% and +13.28% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VOO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.6% compared with 15.3% for OALC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -26.8% for OALC and -24.5% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.97. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OALC charges 0.49% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $3 annually, a gap of $46 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OALC currently yields 0.52% against 1.06% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
96.2% of OALC's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 68.2% of VOO's money is in holdings OALC also owns.
Most of OALC is already inside VOO. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
196 positions in common, counted across the 211 positions we hold weights for in OALC and 504 in VOO, against full books of 424 and 506.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 304 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for OALC (31.6% of the fund), and 15 for OALC that do not appear in VOO (2.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in OALC | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.63% | 8.09% | 0.54% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.37% | 5.70% | 0.67% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.83% | 3.85% | 0.02% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.20% | 3.01% | 0.19% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.61% | 2.65% | 0.04% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.59% | 2.40% | 0.19% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 1.87% | 1.64% | 0.23% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 1.62% | 1.44% | 0.18% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 1.64% | 1.38% | 0.26% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 1.51% | 1.40% | 0.11% |
96.2% of OALC is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OALC or VOO?
OALC has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $46 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, OALC or VOO?
Over the past year OALC returned +19.96% vs +17.55% for VOO, so OALC leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, OALC or VOO?
VOO has been the more volatile fund at 15.6% annualized versus 15.3% for OALC. Worst drawdown: OALC -26.8% vs VOO -24.5%.
Should I hold both OALC and VOO?
OALC and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.97, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between OALC and VOO?
96.2% of OALC's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 68.2% of VOO's is in holdings OALC also owns. They hold 196 positions in common, counted across the 211 positions we hold weights for in OALC and 504 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, OALC or VOO?
OALC yields 0.52% while VOO yields 1.06%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than OALC?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. OALC led over 1Y and 3Y, VOO over 5Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.97. OALC is less concentrated, with 34.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.