OGIG vs QQQG
ALPS O'Shares Global Internet Giants ETF vs Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
Which is better, OGIG or QQQG?
QQQG has been ahead.
OGIG has a lower expense ratio. QQQG led over 1Y and the full window. OGIG is less concentrated, with 45.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OGIG | QQQG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48%Best | 0.49% |
| AUM | $106M | $52M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.08% | 0.06% |
| Holdings | 55 | 104 |
| YTD Return | -2.92% | +27.13%Best |
| 1Y Return | -10.78% | +29.28%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.94% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -2.00% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.6% | 22.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.2% | -23.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.1 years | $12,778 | $14,801Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 45.0%Best | 51.9% |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Pacer ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 5, 2018 | Aug 19, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 20, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.1 years).
OGIG vs QQQG growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.
OGIG vs QQQG Performance
ALPS O'Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors and Pacer Nasdaq 100 Top 50 Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (QQQG) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs. Over the past year OGIG returned -10.78% while QQQG returned +29.28%. Year to date, OGIG is down 2.92% versus a gain of 27.13% for QQQG.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OGIG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.6% compared with 22.2% for QQQG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.2% for OGIG and -23.6% for QQQG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.53. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OGIG charges 0.48% per year while QQQG charges 0.49%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $49 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OGIG currently yields 0.08% against 0.06% for QQQG.
Holdings Overlap
30.4% of OGIG's money is in holdings QQQG also owns. 27.2% of QQQG's money is in holdings OGIG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
14 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in OGIG and 50 in QQQG, against full books of 55 and 104.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 36 positions for QQQG that do not appear in our book for OGIG (72.7% of the fund), and 27 for OGIG that do not appear in QQQG (55.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in OGIG | Weight in QQQG | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| DDOGDatadog Inc | 2.35% | 5.33% | 2.98% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 3.13% | 4.38% | 1.25% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 3.06% | 4.29% | 1.23% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.05% | 1.19% | 4.86% |
| FTNTFortinet Inc | 1.24% | 5.04% | 3.80% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 5.05% | 0.85% | 4.20% |
| MELIMercadolibre Inc | 1.98% | 0.81% | 1.17% |
| APPAppLovin Corp. Com Cl A | 2.03% | 0.61% | 1.42% |
| ABNBAirbnb Inc | 1.02% | 1.23% | 0.21% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 1.30% | 0.73% | 0.57% |
30.4% of OGIG is already inside QQQG.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OGIG or QQQG?
OGIG has an expense ratio of 0.48% while QQQG charges 0.49%. OGIG is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, OGIG or QQQG?
Over the past year OGIG returned -10.78% vs +29.28% for QQQG, so QQQG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), OGIG annualized +12.38% vs +20.53% for QQQG. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, OGIG or QQQG?
OGIG has been the more volatile fund at 23.6% annualized versus 22.2% for QQQG. Worst drawdown: OGIG -33.2% vs QQQG -23.6%.
Should I hold both OGIG and QQQG?
OGIG and QQQG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.53, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between OGIG and QQQG?
30.4% of OGIG's money is in holdings QQQG also owns. 27.2% of QQQG's is in holdings OGIG also owns. They hold 14 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in OGIG and 50 in QQQG.
Which pays a higher dividend, OGIG or QQQG?
OGIG yields 0.08% while QQQG yields 0.06%, so OGIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQG better than OGIG?
OGIG has a lower expense ratio. QQQG led over 1Y and the full window. OGIG is less concentrated, with 45.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 51.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.