OGIG vs QTOP
ALPS O'Shares Global Internet Giants ETF vs iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF
Which is better, OGIG or QTOP?
QTOP has been ahead.
QTOP has a lower expense ratio. QTOP led over 1Y and the full window. OGIG is less concentrated, with 45.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OGIG | QTOP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48% | 0.20%Best |
| AUM | $106M | $362M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.08% | 0.32% |
| Holdings | 55 | 35 |
| YTD Return | -2.92% | +20.85%Best |
| 1Y Return | -10.78% | +24.48%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.94% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -2.00% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.3% | 20.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.2% | -23.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 2 years | $11,931 | $15,750Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 45.0%Best | 59.3% |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 5, 2018 | Oct 24, 2024 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 24, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2 years).
OGIG vs QTOP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2 years both funds cover.
OGIG vs QTOP Performance
ALPS O'Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors and iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year OGIG returned -10.78% while QTOP returned +24.48%. Year to date, OGIG is down 2.92% versus a gain of 20.85% for QTOP.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OGIG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.3% compared with 20.2% for QTOP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.2% for OGIG and -23.1% for QTOP. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.62. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OGIG charges 0.48% per year while QTOP charges 0.20%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $20 annually, a gap of $28 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OGIG currently yields 0.08% against 0.32% for QTOP.
Holdings Overlap
36.8% of OGIG's money is in holdings QTOP also owns. 26.9% of QTOP's money is in holdings OGIG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
8 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in OGIG and 32 in QTOP, against full books of 55 and 35.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 23 positions for QTOP that do not appear in our book for OGIG (71.9% of the fund), and 33 for OGIG that do not appear in QTOP (49.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in OGIG | Weight in QTOP | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.05% | 7.41% | 1.36% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 6.50% | 4.30% | 2.20% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.75% | 4.06% | 1.69% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 5.94% | 3.86% | 2.08% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 5.05% | 2.41% | 2.64% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 3.13% | 1.78% | 1.35% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 3.06% | 1.50% | 1.56% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 1.30% | 1.55% | 0.25% |
36.8% of OGIG is already inside QTOP.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OGIG or QTOP?
OGIG has an expense ratio of 0.48% while QTOP charges 0.20%. QTOP is the cheaper option, by $28 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, OGIG or QTOP?
Over the past year OGIG returned -10.78% vs +24.48% for QTOP, so QTOP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), OGIG annualized +9.23% vs +25.50% for QTOP. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, OGIG or QTOP?
OGIG has been the more volatile fund at 24.3% annualized versus 20.2% for QTOP. Worst drawdown: OGIG -33.2% vs QTOP -23.1%.
Should I hold both OGIG and QTOP?
OGIG and QTOP have a monthly-return correlation of 0.62, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between OGIG and QTOP?
36.8% of OGIG's money is in holdings QTOP also owns. 26.9% of QTOP's is in holdings OGIG also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in OGIG and 32 in QTOP.
Which pays a higher dividend, OGIG or QTOP?
OGIG yields 0.08% while QTOP yields 0.32%, so QTOP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QTOP better than OGIG?
QTOP has a lower expense ratio. QTOP led over 1Y and the full window. OGIG is less concentrated, with 45.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.