OGIG vs QTR
ALPS O'Shares Global Internet Giants ETF vs Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF
Which is better, OGIG or QTR?
QTR has been ahead.
QTR has a lower expense ratio. QTR led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. OGIG is less concentrated, with 45.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OGIG | QTR |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48% | 0.25%Best |
| AUM | $106M | $10M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.08% | 16.32% |
| Holdings | 55 | 105 |
| YTD Return | -2.92% | +12.97%Best |
| 1Y Return | -10.78% | +14.42%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.94% | +20.02%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -2.00% | +11.44%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 25.2% | 18.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -62.8% | -31.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $9,039 | $17,187Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 45.0%Best | 46.4% |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | GLOBALXETFS |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 5, 2018 | Aug 25, 2021 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 26, 2021 to Oct 14, 2026 (5.1 years).
OGIG vs QTR growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 5.1 years both funds cover.
OGIG vs QTR Performance
ALPS O'Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors and Global X NASDAQ 100 Tail Risk ETF (QTR) is an ETF from GLOBALXETFS. Over the past year OGIG returned -10.78% while QTR returned +14.42%. Year to date, OGIG is down 2.92% versus a gain of 12.97% for QTR.
Over three years, OGIG compounded at +16.94% per year against +20.02% for QTR; over five years the annualized figures are -2.00% and +11.44% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OGIG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 25.2% compared with 18.5% for QTR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.8% for OGIG and -31.7% for QTR. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.77. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OGIG charges 0.48% per year while QTR charges 0.25%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $25 annually, a gap of $23 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OGIG currently yields 0.08% against 16.32% for QTR.
Holdings Overlap
55.2% of OGIG's money is in holdings QTR also owns. 26.1% of QTR's money is in holdings OGIG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
21 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in OGIG and 101 in QTR, against full books of 55 and 105.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 75 positions for QTR that do not appear in our book for OGIG (71.7% of the fund), and 22 for OGIG that do not appear in QTR (35.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in OGIG | Weight in QTR | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.05% | 5.71% | 0.34% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.75% | 4.02% | 1.73% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 6.50% | 3.23% | 3.27% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 5.94% | 2.98% | 2.96% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 5.05% | 1.81% | 3.24% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 3.13% | 1.33% | 1.80% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 3.06% | 1.12% | 1.94% |
| SHOP:CAShopify Inc | 2.94% | 0.74% | 2.20% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc | 2.35% | 0.39% | 1.96% |
| NFLXNetflix, Inc. | 1.30% | 1.17% | 0.13% |
55.2% of OGIG is already inside QTR.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OGIG or QTR?
OGIG has an expense ratio of 0.48% while QTR charges 0.25%. QTR is the cheaper option, by $23 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, OGIG or QTR?
Over the past year OGIG returned -10.78% vs +14.42% for QTR, so QTR leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, OGIG or QTR?
OGIG has been the more volatile fund at 25.2% annualized versus 18.5% for QTR. Worst drawdown: OGIG -62.8% vs QTR -31.7%.
Should I hold both OGIG and QTR?
OGIG and QTR have a monthly-return correlation of 0.77, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between OGIG and QTR?
55.2% of OGIG's money is in holdings QTR also owns. 26.1% of QTR's is in holdings OGIG also owns. They hold 21 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in OGIG and 101 in QTR.
Which pays a higher dividend, OGIG or QTR?
OGIG yields 0.08% while QTR yields 16.32%, so QTR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QTR better than OGIG?
QTR has a lower expense ratio. QTR led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. OGIG is less concentrated, with 45.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.