OGIG vs TEC
ALPS O'Shares Global Internet Giants ETF vs Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF
Which is better, OGIG or TEC?
TEC has been ahead.
OGIG has a lower expense ratio. TEC led over 1Y and the full window. OGIG is less concentrated, with 45.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | OGIG | TEC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.48%Best | 0.69% |
| AUM | $106M | $7M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.08% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 55 | 88 |
| YTD Return | -2.92% | +20.68%Best |
| 1Y Return | -10.78% | +22.30%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.94% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -2.00% | - |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.9% | 21.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -33.2% | -17.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.5 years | $12,145 | $17,518Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 45.0%Best | 50.9% |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Harbor Funds |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Jun 5, 2018 | Apr 16, 2025 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.5 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Apr 17, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.5 years).
OGIG vs TEC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.5 years both funds cover.
OGIG vs TEC Performance
ALPS O'Shares Global Internet Giants ETF (OGIG) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors and Harbor Transformative Technologies ETF (TEC) is an ETF from Harbor Funds. Over the past year OGIG returned -10.78% while TEC returned +22.30%. Year to date, OGIG is down 2.92% versus a gain of 20.68% for TEC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
OGIG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.9% compared with 21.8% for TEC. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -33.2% for OGIG and -17.5% for TEC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
OGIG charges 0.48% per year while TEC charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $48 vs $69 annually, a gap of $21 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, OGIG currently yields 0.08% against 0.00% for TEC.
Holdings Overlap
55.6% of OGIG's money is in holdings TEC also owns. 39.1% of TEC's money is in holdings OGIG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
16 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in OGIG and 44 in TEC, against full books of 55 and 88.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 24 positions for TEC that do not appear in our book for OGIG (52.6% of the fund), and 26 for OGIG that do not appear in TEC (33.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in OGIG | Weight in TEC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 6.05% | 5.88% | 0.17% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 5.94% | 5.50% | 0.44% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 5.75% | 4.98% | 0.77% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 6.50% | 3.15% | 3.35% |
| PLTRPalantir Technologies Inc | 5.05% | 1.17% | 3.88% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc | 3.06% | 2.95% | 0.11% |
| SNOWSnowflake Inc | 2.47% | 3.40% | 0.93% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 3.13% | 2.09% | 1.04% |
| DDOGDatadog Inc | 2.35% | 2.67% | 0.32% |
| ORCLOracle Corp - Common | 4.03% | 0.97% | 3.06% |
55.6% of OGIG is already inside TEC.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, OGIG or TEC?
OGIG has an expense ratio of 0.48% while TEC charges 0.69%. OGIG is the cheaper option, by $21 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, OGIG or TEC?
Over the past year OGIG returned -10.78% vs +22.30% for TEC, so TEC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), OGIG annualized +13.83% vs +45.32% for TEC. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, OGIG or TEC?
OGIG has been the more volatile fund at 23.9% annualized versus 21.8% for TEC. Worst drawdown: OGIG -33.2% vs TEC -17.5%.
Should I hold both OGIG and TEC?
OGIG and TEC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between OGIG and TEC?
55.6% of OGIG's money is in holdings TEC also owns. 39.1% of TEC's is in holdings OGIG also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 51 positions we hold weights for in OGIG and 44 in TEC.
Which pays a higher dividend, OGIG or TEC?
OGIG yields 0.08% while TEC yields 0.00%, so OGIG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is TEC better than OGIG?
OGIG has a lower expense ratio. TEC led over 1Y and the full window. OGIG is less concentrated, with 45.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.