PJSM vs SMAP
PGIM Jennison Small-Mid Cap Core Equity ETF vs Amplify Small-Mid Cap Equity ETF
Which is better, PJSM or SMAP?
PJSM costs less.
PJSM has a lower expense ratio. PJSM is less concentrated, with 18.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 32.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PJSM | SMAP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.29%Best | 0.60% |
| AUM | $6M | $1M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 249 | 57 |
| Volatility (annualized) | - | 15.0% |
| Max Drawdown | - | -24.2% |
| Top 10 Weight | 18.4%Best | 32.8% |
| Fund Family | PGIM Investments | Amplify ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Small Cap Blend | Small Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 1, 2026 | Oct 23, 2024 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), $10,000 over the window.
The two price series end 132 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. PJSM has data through Oct 14, 2026 and SMAP through Jun 4, 2026.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PJSM charges 0.29% per year while SMAP charges 0.60%. On a $10,000 position that is $29 vs $60 annually, a gap of $31 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PJSM currently yields 0.00% against 0.42% for SMAP.
Holdings Overlap
4.7% of PJSM's money is in holdings SMAP also owns. 13.7% of SMAP's money is in holdings PJSM also owns.
SMAP and PJSM share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 155 days apart, PJSM as of Oct 2, 2026 and SMAP as of Apr 30, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
8 positions in common, counted across the 249 positions we hold weights for in PJSM and 56 in SMAP, against full books of 249 and 57.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 46 positions for SMAP that do not appear in our book for PJSM (84.1% of the fund), and 233 for PJSM that do not appear in SMAP (90.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PJSM | Weight in SMAP | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MKLMarkel Group Inc | 1.96% | 2.16% | 0.20% |
| WTFCWintrust Financial Corp | 1.26% | 1.95% | 0.69% |
| EGPEastgroup Properties Inc. Real Estate Investment Trust | 0.39% | 2.14% | 1.75% |
| BWXTBwx Technologies, Inc. | 0.16% | 1.95% | 1.79% |
| SOISolaris Oilfield Infrastructure Inc Com Cl A | 0.31% | 1.61% | 1.30% |
| PNFPPinnacle Financial Partners In Common Stock Usd1.0 | 0.18% | 1.59% | 1.41% |
| TXRHTexas Roadhouse Inc | 0.11% | 1.47% | 1.36% |
| QTWOQ2 Holdings, Inc. | 0.36% | 0.83% | 0.47% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of PJSM and SMAP you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PJSM or SMAP?
PJSM has an expense ratio of 0.29% while SMAP charges 0.60%. PJSM is the cheaper option, by $31 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between PJSM and SMAP?
13.7% of SMAP's money is in holdings PJSM also owns. 13.7% of SMAP's is in holdings PJSM also owns. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 249 positions we hold weights for in PJSM and 56 in SMAP.
Which pays a higher dividend, PJSM or SMAP?
PJSM yields 0.00% while SMAP yields 0.42%, so SMAP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SMAP better than PJSM?
PJSM has a lower expense ratio. PJSM is less concentrated, with 18.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 32.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.