PRN vs VTI
Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, PRN or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PRN led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PRN | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $340M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 96 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +8.44% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +9.06% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.80%Best | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +14.17%Best | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.4% | 15.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -59.9% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $19,398Best | $17,616 |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.0% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 12, 2006 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 12, 2006 to Oct 14, 2026 (20 years).
PRN vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 20 years both funds cover.
PRN vs VTI Performance
Invesco Dorsey Wright Industrials Momentum ETF (PRN) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year PRN returned +9.06% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, PRN is up 8.44% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, PRN compounded at +24.80% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +14.17% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, PRN has the edge at +11.35% annualized vs +9.43%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PRN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.4% compared with 15.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -59.9% for PRN and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PRN charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PRN currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
95.5% of PRN's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.8% of VTI's money is in holdings PRN also owns.
Most of PRN is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
32 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in PRN and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 96 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,135 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for PRN (95.8% of the fund), and 2 for PRN that do not appear in VTI (2.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PRN | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| GWWWw Grainger Inc. | 5.09% | 0.08% | 5.01% |
| SANMSanmina Corp | 4.85% | 0.01% | 4.84% |
| CTASCintas Corp. | 4.73% | 0.09% | 4.64% |
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 4.20% | 0.47% | 3.73% |
| RTXRaytheon Technologies Corp | 3.63% | 0.38% | 3.25% |
| PHParker-Hannifin Corp. | 3.76% | 0.17% | 3.59% |
| JCIJohnson Controls Internation S | 3.71% | 0.11% | 3.60% |
| CLHClean Harbors Inc | 3.78% | 0.02% | 3.76% |
| WABWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp. | 3.73% | 0.07% | 3.66% |
| PAYCPaycom Software Inc . | 3.49% | 0.01% | 3.48% |
95.5% of PRN is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PRN or VTI?
PRN has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PRN or VTI?
Over the past year PRN returned +9.06% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), PRN annualized +11.35% vs +9.43% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PRN or VTI?
PRN has been the more volatile fund at 21.4% annualized versus 15.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: PRN -59.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both PRN and VTI?
PRN and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PRN and VTI?
95.5% of PRN's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 1.8% of VTI's is in holdings PRN also owns. They hold 32 positions in common, counted across the 35 positions we hold weights for in PRN and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, PRN or VTI?
PRN yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than PRN?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. PRN led over 3Y, 5Y and the full window, VTI over 1Y. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.