QQJG vs VOO
Invesco ESG NASDAQ Next Gen 100 ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, QQJG or VOO?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. QQJG is less concentrated, with 27.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQJG | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $7M | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 0.69% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 84 | 506 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 19.2% | 15.5%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -36.8% | -24.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.3 years | $10,344 | $15,951Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 27.1%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 27, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 233 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. QQJG has data through Feb 23, 2026 and VOO through Oct 14, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 27, 2021 to Feb 23, 2026 (4.3 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQJG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 19.2% compared with 15.5% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -36.8% for QQJG and -24.5% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.92. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQJG charges 0.20% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQJG currently yields 0.69% against 1.06% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
51.4% of QQJG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.7% of VOO's money is in holdings QQJG also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
The two holdings books were reported 335 days apart, QQJG as of Sep 30, 2025 and VOO as of Aug 31, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
35 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in QQJG and 504 in VOO, against full books of 84 and 506.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 465 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for QQJG (98.1% of the fund), and 39 for QQJG that do not appear in VOO (33.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQJG | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| STXSeagate Technolo | 4.09% | 0.28% | 3.81% |
| WDCWestern Digital Corp. | 3.51% | 0.23% | 3.28% |
| MPWRMonolithic Power Systems Inc | 3.27% | 0.09% | 3.18% |
| EBAYEbay Inc. | 2.72% | 0.07% | 2.65% |
| TSCOTractor Supply Co | 2.29% | 0.03% | 2.26% |
| FLEX:SIFlex Ltd | 2.21% | 0.06% | 2.15% |
| SMCISuper Micro Computer Inc Common Stock Usd 0.001 | 2.23% | 0.03% | 2.20% |
| ULTAUlta Beauty Inc. | 2.01% | 0.04% | 1.97% |
| NTAPNetapp Inc | 1.92% | 0.06% | 1.86% |
| PTCPtc, Inc.(A) | 1.80% | 0.03% | 1.77% |
51.4% of QQJG is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQJG or VOO?
QQJG has an expense ratio of 0.20% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, QQJG or VOO?
QQJG has been the more volatile fund at 19.2% annualized versus 15.5% for VOO. Worst drawdown: QQJG -36.8% vs VOO -24.5%.
Should I hold both QQJG and VOO?
QQJG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.92, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQJG and VOO?
51.4% of QQJG's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.7% of VOO's is in holdings QQJG also owns. They hold 35 positions in common, counted across the 88 positions we hold weights for in QQJG and 504 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQJG or VOO?
QQJG yields 0.69% while VOO yields 1.06%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than QQJG?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.92. QQJG is less concentrated, with 27.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.