QQQ vs SMHC
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 vs VanEck China Semiconductor ETF
Which is better, QQQ or SMHC?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQQ | SMHC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.18%Best | 0.65% |
| AUM | $506.1B | $14M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.42% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 321 | 57 |
| YTD Return | +19.30%Best | -37.22% |
| 1Y Return | +22.47% | - |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.18% | - |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +15.42% | - |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | VanEck |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 10, 1999 | Jun 23, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
QQQ vs SMHC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
QQQ vs SMHC Performance
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and VanEck China Semiconductor ETF (SMHC) is an ETF from VanEck. Year to date, QQQ is up 19.30% versus a loss of 37.22% for SMHC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQQ charges 0.18% per year while SMHC charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $18 vs $65 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQQ currently yields 0.42% against 0.00% for SMHC.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 101 holdings in QQQ and 25 in SMHC, totalling 99.6% and 94.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQQ and 25 in SMHC, against full books of 321 and 57.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQQ and SMHC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQQ or SMHC?
QQQ has an expense ratio of 0.18% while SMHC charges 0.65%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQQ or SMHC?
QQQ yields 0.42% while SMHC yields 0.00%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SMHC better than QQQ?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.