QQWZ vs VYM
Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, QQWZ or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. QQWZ led over the full window, VYM over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QQWZ | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.49% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $42M | $78.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.64% | 2.37% |
| Holdings | 207 | 608 |
| YTD Return | +7.29% | +11.83%Best |
| 1Y Return | +10.76% | +15.96%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.60% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.7% | 9.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -11.3% | -6.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $13,606Best | $13,083 |
| Top 10 Weight | 46.5% | 25.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | May 6, 2025 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 7, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.4 years).
QQWZ vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
QQWZ vs VYM Performance
Pacer Cash COWZ 100-Nasdaq 100 Rotator ETF (QQWZ) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QQWZ returned +10.76% while VYM returned +15.96%. Year to date, QQWZ is up 7.29% versus a gain of 11.83% for VYM.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQWZ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.7% compared with 9.9% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -11.3% for QQWZ and -6.7% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.39. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QQWZ charges 0.49% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $49 vs $4 annually, a gap of $45 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QQWZ currently yields 0.64% against 2.37% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
15.3% of QQWZ's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 19.1% of VYM's money is in holdings QQWZ also owns.
VYM and QQWZ share little of their money.
27 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQWZ and 602 in VYM, against full books of 207 and 608.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 546 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for QQWZ (78.8% of the fund), and 69 for QQWZ that do not appear in VYM (82.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QQWZ | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.47% | 6.94% | 4.47% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.78% | 1.76% | 0.02% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 1.07% | 0.96% | 0.11% |
| LINLinde Plc Ordinary Shares | 0.90% | 0.91% | 0.01% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 0.92% | 0.86% | 0.06% |
| ADIAnalog Devices, Inc. | 0.82% | 0.71% | 0.11% |
| QCOMQualcomm Inc. | 0.80% | 0.72% | 0.08% |
| GILDGilead Sciences | 0.76% | 0.73% | 0.03% |
| PEPPepsico Inc. | 0.71% | 0.77% | 0.06% |
| TMUST-Mobile Usa Inc Esrw Usd Npv Ref Sm#585558 | 0.72% | 0.35% | 0.37% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of QQWZ and VYM you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QQWZ or VYM?
QQWZ has an expense ratio of 0.49% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $45 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QQWZ or VYM?
Over the past year QQWZ returned +10.76% vs +15.96% for VYM, so VYM leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), QQWZ annualized +24.60% vs +21.16% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QQWZ or VYM?
QQWZ has been the more volatile fund at 16.7% annualized versus 9.9% for VYM. Worst drawdown: QQWZ -11.3% vs VYM -6.7%.
Should I hold both QQWZ and VYM?
QQWZ and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.39, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QQWZ and VYM?
19.1% of VYM's money is in holdings QQWZ also owns. 19.1% of VYM's is in holdings QQWZ also owns. They hold 27 positions in common, counted across the 101 positions we hold weights for in QQWZ and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, QQWZ or VYM?
QQWZ yields 0.64% while VYM yields 2.37%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than QQWZ?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. QQWZ led over the full window, VYM over 1Y. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.