QSIX vs VTI
Pacer Metaurus Nasdaq-100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, QSIX or VTI?
Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. QSIX led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QSIX | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $22M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.60% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 107 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +17.19%Best | +13.02% |
| 1Y Return | +20.19%Best | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.5% | 12.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -19.5% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 2.1 years | $14,995Best | $13,786 |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 23, 2024 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 24, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.1 years).
QSIX vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.
QSIX vs VTI Performance
Pacer Metaurus Nasdaq-100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year QSIX returned +20.19% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, QSIX is up 17.19% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QSIX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.5% compared with 12.7% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.5% for QSIX and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.88. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QSIX charges 0.60% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $3 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QSIX currently yields 3.60% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 48.0% of VTI's money is in holdings QSIX also owns.
Stated as a floor: for QSIX, our book for it covers 93.0% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
90 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in QSIX and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 107 and 3,524.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QSIX | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.96% | 6.88% | 1.08% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.72% | 6.30% | 0.42% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.42% | 5.11% | 0.31% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.82% | 3.41% | 0.41% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.50% | 1.46% | 3.04% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 2.82% | 2.70% | 0.12% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 4.04% | 1.04% | 3.00% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.47% | 2.38% | 0.09% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc. C | 2.63% | 2.12% | 0.51% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.03% | 1.70% | 1.33% |
48.0% of VTI is already inside QSIX.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QSIX or VTI?
QSIX has an expense ratio of 0.60% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QSIX or VTI?
Over the past year QSIX returned +20.19% vs +16.63% for VTI, so QSIX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QSIX annualized +21.28% vs +16.52% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QSIX or VTI?
QSIX has been the more volatile fund at 16.5% annualized versus 12.7% for VTI. Worst drawdown: QSIX -19.5% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both QSIX and VTI?
QSIX and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.88, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QSIX and VTI?
At least 48.0% of VTI's money is in holdings QSIX also owns. Our book for QSIX is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 90 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in QSIX and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, QSIX or VTI?
QSIX yields 3.60% while VTI yields 1.06%, so QSIX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than QSIX?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. QSIX led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.