RECI vs USSE
Columbia Research Enhanced Core Premium Income ETF vs Segall Bryant & Hamill Select Equity ETF
Which is better, RECI or USSE?
RECI costs less.
RECI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RECI | USSE |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.30%Best | 0.65% |
| AUM | $10M | $372M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.67% | 0.00% |
| Holdings | 715 | 42 |
| YTD Return | +2.97% | +22.80%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +25.31% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +18.49% |
| Fund Family | Columbia Threadneedle Investments | Segall Bryaant & Hamill Asset management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jul 14, 2026 | Aug 29, 2023 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
RECI vs USSE growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
RECI vs USSE Performance
Columbia Research Enhanced Core Premium Income ETF (RECI) is an ETF from Columbia Threadneedle Investments and Segall Bryant & Hamill Select Equity ETF (USSE) is an ETF from Segall Bryaant & Hamill Asset management. Year to date, RECI is up 2.97% versus a gain of 22.80% for USSE.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RECI charges 0.30% per year while USSE charges 0.65%. On a $10,000 position that is $30 vs $65 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RECI currently yields 0.67% against 0.00% for USSE.
Holdings Overlap
At least 38.2% of USSE's money is in holdings RECI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for RECI, our book for it covers 80.1% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
8 positions in common, counted across the 354 positions we hold weights for in RECI and 20 in USSE, against full books of 715 and 42.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RECI | Weight in USSE | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 10.27% | 7.48% | 2.79% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 9.59% | 4.67% | 4.92% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.76% | 3.68% | 0.08% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc. | 0.39% | 5.81% | 5.42% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 0.60% | 5.05% | 4.45% |
| APHAmphenol Corp. Class A | 0.36% | 4.15% | 3.79% |
| RGAReinsurance Group of America, Incorporated | 0.07% | 3.74% | 3.67% |
| MSIMotorola Solutions, Inc | 0.14% | 3.63% | 3.49% |
38.2% of USSE is already inside RECI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RECI or USSE?
RECI has an expense ratio of 0.30% while USSE charges 0.65%. RECI is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between RECI and USSE?
At least 38.2% of USSE's money is in holdings RECI also owns. Our book for RECI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 8 positions in common, counted across the 354 positions we hold weights for in RECI and 20 in USSE.
Which pays a higher dividend, RECI or USSE?
RECI yields 0.67% while USSE yields 0.00%, so RECI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is USSE better than RECI?
RECI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.