RNIN vs VOO
Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, RNIN or VOO?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. RNIN led over 1Y and the full window. RNIN is less concentrated, with 13.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RNIN | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.68% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $205M | $1.0T |
| Dividend Yield | 0.84% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 82 | 506 |
| YTD Return | +32.55%Best | +13.57% |
| 1Y Return | +36.37%Best | +17.55% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +22.46% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 14.0% | 11.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -8.3%Best | -8.9% |
| $10,000 over 1.4 years | $14,664Best | $13,222 |
| Top 10 Weight | 13.5%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | Bushido Capital | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 14, 2025 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 15, 2025 to Oct 14, 2026 (1.4 years).
RNIN vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1.4 years both funds cover.
RNIN vs VOO Performance
Bushido Capital US SMID Cap Equity ETF (RNIN) is an ETF from Bushido Capital and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year RNIN returned +36.37% while VOO returned +17.55%. Year to date, RNIN is up 32.55% versus a gain of 13.57% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RNIN has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 14.0% compared with 11.6% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.3% for RNIN and -8.9% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.32. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RNIN charges 0.68% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $68 vs $3 annually, a gap of $65 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RNIN currently yields 0.84% against 1.06% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
22.3% of RNIN's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.6% of VOO's money is in holdings RNIN also owns.
RNIN and VOO share little of their money.
18 positions in common, counted across the 81 positions we hold weights for in RNIN and 504 in VOO, against full books of 82 and 506.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 481 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for RNIN (99.2% of the fund), and 61 for RNIN that do not appear in VOO (75.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RNIN | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NTAPNetapp Inc | 1.39% | 0.06% | 1.33% |
| ITGartner Inc. | 1.35% | 0.02% | 1.33% |
| DLTRDollar Tree Inc. | 1.28% | 0.03% | 1.25% |
| KRKroger Co. | 1.26% | 0.05% | 1.21% |
| WDAYWorkday, Inc., Class A | 1.24% | 0.06% | 1.18% |
| VRSKVerisk Analytics, Inc, Class A | 1.25% | 0.04% | 1.21% |
| LENLennar Corp. Class A | 1.25% | 0.03% | 1.22% |
| SQBlock, Inc | 1.21% | 0.07% | 1.14% |
| EXPEExpedia Inc | 1.22% | 0.05% | 1.17% |
| DECKDeckers Outdoor Corp | 1.24% | 0.02% | 1.22% |
22.3% of RNIN is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RNIN or VOO?
RNIN has an expense ratio of 0.68% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $65 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, RNIN or VOO?
Over the past year RNIN returned +36.37% vs +17.55% for VOO, so RNIN leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), RNIN annualized +31.45% vs +22.08% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, RNIN or VOO?
RNIN has been the more volatile fund at 14.0% annualized versus 11.6% for VOO. Worst drawdown: RNIN -8.3% vs VOO -8.9%.
Should I hold both RNIN and VOO?
RNIN and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.32, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between RNIN and VOO?
22.3% of RNIN's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 0.6% of VOO's is in holdings RNIN also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 81 positions we hold weights for in RNIN and 504 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, RNIN or VOO?
RNIN yields 0.84% while VOO yields 1.06%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than RNIN?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. RNIN led over 1Y and the full window. RNIN is less concentrated, with 13.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.