RSHO vs RWLC
Tema American Reshoring ETF vs Rayliant NxtGen Multifactor US Equity ETF
Which is better, RSHO or RWLC?
RSHO has been ahead.
RWLC has a lower expense ratio. RSHO led over 1Y. RWLC is less concentrated, with 37.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.1%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSHO | RWLC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.32%Best |
| AUM | $302M | $100M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.23% | 12.70% |
| Holdings | 25 | 208 |
| Top 10 Weight | 61.1% | 37.2%Best |
| Fund Family | Tema Global Limited | The Advisors Inner Circle Fund |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 11, 2023 | Dec 15, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
The two price series end 118 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. RSHO has data through Jun 18, 2026 and RWLC through Oct 14, 2026.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSHO charges 0.75% per year while RWLC charges 0.32%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $32 annually, a gap of $43 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSHO currently yields 0.23% against 12.70% for RWLC.
Holdings Overlap
1.0% of RSHO's money is in holdings RWLC also owns. 1.2% of RWLC's money is in holdings RSHO also owns.
RWLC and RSHO share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 134 days apart, RSHO as of Apr 30, 2026 and RWLC as of Sep 11, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
1 positions in common, counted across the 24 positions we hold weights for in RSHO and 101 in RWLC, against full books of 25 and 208.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 98 positions for RWLC that do not appear in our book for RSHO (97.5% of the fund), and 21 for RSHO that do not appear in RWLC (90.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in RSHO | Weight in RWLC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 1.00% | 1.22% | 0.22% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RSHO and RWLC you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSHO or RWLC?
RSHO has an expense ratio of 0.75% while RWLC charges 0.32%. RWLC is the cheaper option, by $43 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between RSHO and RWLC?
1.2% of RWLC's money is in holdings RSHO also owns. 1.2% of RWLC's is in holdings RSHO also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 24 positions we hold weights for in RSHO and 101 in RWLC.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSHO or RWLC?
RSHO yields 0.23% while RWLC yields 12.70%, so RWLC currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is RWLC better than RSHO?
RWLC has a lower expense ratio. RSHO led over 1Y. RWLC is less concentrated, with 37.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 61.1%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.