RSHO vs SECT
Tema American Reshoring ETF vs Main Sector Rotation ETF
Which is better, RSHO or SECT?
RSHO has been ahead.
SECT has a lower expense ratio. RSHO led over 1Y and the full window. RSHO is less concentrated, with 61.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 100.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSHO | SECT |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.69%Best |
| AUM | $302M | $2.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.23% | 0.69% |
| Holdings | 25 | 19 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.6% | 14.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -27.3% | -21.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $24,965Best | $18,015 |
| Top 10 Weight | 61.1%Best | 100.0% |
| Fund Family | Tema Global Limited | Main Management ETF Advisors, LLC |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 11, 2023 | Sep 5, 2017 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized).
The two price series end 118 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. RSHO has data through Jun 18, 2026 and SECT through Oct 14, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 11, 2023 to Jun 18, 2026 (3.1 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSHO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.6% compared with 14.0% for SECT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.3% for RSHO and -21.7% for SECT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.76. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSHO charges 0.75% per year while SECT charges 0.69%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $69 annually, a gap of $6 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSHO currently yields 0.23% against 0.69% for SECT.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 24 holdings in RSHO and 10 in SECT, totalling 99.0% and 100.0% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 154 days apart, RSHO as of Apr 30, 2026 and SECT as of Oct 1, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 24 positions we hold weights for in RSHO and 10 in SECT, against full books of 25 and 19.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 10 positions for SECT that do not appear in our book for RSHO (100.0% of the fund), and 22 for RSHO that do not appear in SECT (91.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RSHO and SECT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSHO or SECT?
RSHO has an expense ratio of 0.75% while SECT charges 0.69%. SECT is the cheaper option, by $6 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, RSHO or SECT?
RSHO has been the more volatile fund at 22.6% annualized versus 14.0% for SECT. Worst drawdown: RSHO -27.3% vs SECT -21.7%.
Should I hold both RSHO and SECT?
RSHO and SECT have a monthly-return correlation of 0.76, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSHO or SECT?
RSHO yields 0.23% while SECT yields 0.69%, so SECT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SECT better than RSHO?
SECT has a lower expense ratio. RSHO led over 1Y and the full window. RSHO is less concentrated, with 61.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 100.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.