RSHO vs ZHDG
Tema American Reshoring ETF vs ZEGA Buy and Hedge ETF
Which is better, RSHO or ZHDG?
RSHO has been ahead.
RSHO has a lower expense ratio. RSHO led over 1Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | RSHO | ZHDG |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75%Best | 0.95% |
| AUM | $302M | $31M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.23% | 2.42% |
| Holdings | 25 | 28 |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.6% | 11.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -27.3% | -11.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $24,965Best | $15,269 |
| Fund Family | Tema Global Limited | Zega ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 11, 2023 | Jul 6, 2021 |
Not shown on this pair: YTD Return, 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Top 10 Weight.
The two price series end 118 days apart, so a return over any period would be measuring two different stretches of market. Those rows are withheld. RSHO has data through Jun 18, 2026 and ZHDG through Oct 14, 2026.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 11, 2023 to Jun 18, 2026 (3.1 years).
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
RSHO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.6% compared with 11.1% for ZHDG. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -27.3% for RSHO and -11.6% for ZHDG. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
RSHO charges 0.75% per year while ZHDG charges 0.95%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $95 annually, a gap of $20 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, RSHO currently yields 0.23% against 2.42% for ZHDG.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 24 holdings in RSHO and 2 in ZHDG, totalling 99.0% and 8.2% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
The two holdings books were reported 158 days apart, RSHO as of Apr 30, 2026 and ZHDG as of Oct 5, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
0 positions in common, counted across the 24 positions we hold weights for in RSHO and 2 in ZHDG, against full books of 25 and 28.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of RSHO and ZHDG you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, RSHO or ZHDG?
RSHO has an expense ratio of 0.75% while ZHDG charges 0.95%. RSHO is the cheaper option, by $20 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which is riskier, RSHO or ZHDG?
RSHO has been the more volatile fund at 22.6% annualized versus 11.1% for ZHDG. Worst drawdown: RSHO -27.3% vs ZHDG -11.6%.
Should I hold both RSHO and ZHDG?
RSHO and ZHDG have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, RSHO or ZHDG?
RSHO yields 0.23% while ZHDG yields 2.42%, so ZHDG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is ZHDG better than RSHO?
RSHO has a lower expense ratio. RSHO led over 1Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.