UTSL vs VTI

UTSL vs VTI

Which is better, UTSL or VTI?

Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.

VTI has a lower expense ratio. UTSL led over 3Y, VTI over 1Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: VTIHigher Returns: split

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricUTSLVTI
Expense Ratio0.97%0.03%Best
AUM$74M$689.2B
Dividend Yield3.18%1.06%
Holdings803,524
YTD Return-16.57%+13.02%Best
1Y Return-31.12%+16.63%Best
3Y Return (annualized)+25.69%Best+21.97%
5Y Return (annualized)+4.09%+11.99%Best
Volatility (annualized)48.3%16.2%Best
Max Drawdown-79.5%-35.0%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$12,219$17,616Best
Fund FamilyDirexion Shares ETF TrustVanguard (US)
CategoryAlternativeEquity
StyleMulti AlternativeLarge Cap Blend
InceptionMay 3, 2017May 24, 2001

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: May 3, 2017 to Oct 14, 2026 (9.4 years).

UTSL vs VTI growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 9.4 years both funds cover.

UTSL vs VTI Performance

Direxion Daily Utilities Bull 3X ETF (UTSL) is an ETF from Direxion Shares ETF Trust and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year UTSL returned -31.12% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, UTSL is down 16.57% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.

Over three years, UTSL compounded at +25.69% per year against +21.97% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +4.09% and +11.99% respectively. Across the full 9-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +13.56% annualized vs +4.65%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

UTSL has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 48.3% compared with 16.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -79.5% for UTSL and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.48. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.

Fees and Cost Over Time

UTSL charges 0.97% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $97 vs $3 annually, a gap of $94 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, UTSL currently yields 3.18% against 1.06% for VTI.

Holdings Overlap

VTI already in UTSL1.8%

At least 1.8% of VTI's money is in holdings UTSL also owns.

Stated as a floor: for UTSL, our book for it covers 33.0% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.

VTI and UTSL share little of their money.

31 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in UTSL and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 80 and 3,524.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in UTSLWeight in VTIDifference
NEENextera Energy, Inc.2.65%0.23%2.42%
SOSouthern Co/The1.60%0.13%1.47%
DUKDuke Energy Corp1.47%0.13%1.34%
CEGConstellation Energy Corp1.42%0.12%1.30%
AEPAmerican Electric Power Co. Inc.1.08%0.09%0.99%
DDominion Energy Inc0.89%0.08%0.81%
SRESempra Common Stock0.85%0.07%0.78%
ETREntergy Corp0.78%0.07%0.71%
VSTVistra Energy Corp.0.73%0.06%0.67%
XELXcel Energy Inc Common Stock Usd 2.50.73%0.06%0.67%

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of UTSL and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

UTSLVTI

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, UTSL or VTI?

UTSL has an expense ratio of 0.97% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $94 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, UTSL or VTI?

Over the past year UTSL returned -31.12% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (9 years), UTSL annualized +4.65% vs +13.56% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, UTSL or VTI?

UTSL has been the more volatile fund at 48.3% annualized versus 16.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: UTSL -79.5% vs VTI -35.0%.

Should I hold both UTSL and VTI?

UTSL and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.48, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between UTSL and VTI?

At least 1.8% of VTI's money is in holdings UTSL also owns. Our book for UTSL is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 31 positions in common, counted across the 34 positions we hold weights for in UTSL and 3,441 in VTI.

Which pays a higher dividend, UTSL or VTI?

UTSL yields 3.18% while VTI yields 1.06%, so UTSL currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VTI better than UTSL?

VTI has a lower expense ratio. UTSL led over 3Y, VTI over 1Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.