BBEM vs VTI
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, BBEM or VTI?
Each has led over a different period.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. BBEM led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | BBEM | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $857M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 4.59% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 1,489 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +13.13%Best | +13.02% |
| 1Y Return | +21.67%Best | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.35% | +21.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1% | 13.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -17.4%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 3.4 years | $17,348 | $19,227Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.9% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | J.P. Morgan Asset Management | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 10, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.4 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 12, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.4 years).
BBEM vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.4 years both funds cover.
BBEM vs VTI Performance
JPMorgan BetaBuilders Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BBEM) is an ETF from J.P. Morgan Asset Management and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year BBEM returned +21.67% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, BBEM is up 13.13% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, BBEM compounded at +20.35% per year against +21.97% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
BBEM has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.1% compared with 13.1% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.4% for BBEM and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
BBEM charges 0.15% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, BBEM currently yields 4.59% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
0.3% of BBEM's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.1% of VTI's money is in holdings BBEM also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
5 positions in common, counted across the 1,433 positions we hold weights for in BBEM and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 1,489 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,152 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for BBEM (97.5% of the fund), and 8 for BBEM that do not appear in VTI (1.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of BBEM and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, BBEM or VTI?
BBEM has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, BBEM or VTI?
Over the past year BBEM returned +21.67% vs +16.63% for VTI, so BBEM leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, BBEM or VTI?
BBEM has been the more volatile fund at 15.1% annualized versus 13.1% for VTI. Worst drawdown: BBEM -17.4% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both BBEM and VTI?
BBEM and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, BBEM or VTI?
BBEM yields 4.59% while VTI yields 1.06%, so BBEM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than BBEM?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. BBEM led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.