EIPX vs IVV
FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, EIPX or IVV?
Each has led over a different period.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EIPX led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y and the full window. EIPX is less concentrated, with 37.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EIPX | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $575M | $896.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.89% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 174 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +24.60%Best | +13.59% |
| 1Y Return | +30.77%Best | +17.54% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.80% | +22.46%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.28% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.3% | 12.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -15.4%Best | -18.8% |
| $10,000 over 3.9 years | $18,539 | $21,724Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.4%Best | 38.9% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2022 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 3, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.9 years).
EIPX vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.
EIPX vs IVV Performance
FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EIPX returned +30.77% while IVV returned +17.54%. Year to date, EIPX is up 24.60% versus a gain of 13.59% for IVV.
Over three years, EIPX compounded at +18.80% per year against +22.46% for IVV. Across the full 4-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +22.01% annualized vs +17.15%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EIPX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.3% compared with 12.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.4% for EIPX and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.32. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EIPX charges 0.95% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EIPX currently yields 2.89% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
40.4% of EIPX's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 4.3% of IVV's money is in holdings EIPX also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
42 positions in common, counted across the 89 positions we hold weights for in EIPX and 506 in IVV, against full books of 174 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 458 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for EIPX (95.1% of the fund), and 33 for EIPX that do not appear in IVV (49.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EIPX | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 3.47% | 1.02% | 2.45% |
| KMIKinder Morgan Inc./de | 2.50% | 0.09% | 2.41% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 2.47% | 0.08% | 2.39% |
| SOSouthern Co. | 1.74% | 0.15% | 1.59% |
| BKRBaker Hughes A Ge Company | 1.78% | 0.08% | 1.70% |
| SRESempra Common Stock | 1.78% | 0.08% | 1.70% |
| DUKDuke Energy Corp | 1.48% | 0.13% | 1.35% |
| EVRGEvergy Inc. | 1.51% | 0.03% | 1.48% |
| EOGEog Resources Inc | 1.31% | 0.11% | 1.20% |
| HALHalliburton Co. | 1.38% | 0.04% | 1.34% |
40.4% of EIPX is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EIPX or IVV?
EIPX has an expense ratio of 0.95% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EIPX or IVV?
Over the past year EIPX returned +30.77% vs +17.54% for IVV, so EIPX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), EIPX annualized +17.15% vs +22.01% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EIPX or IVV?
EIPX has been the more volatile fund at 13.3% annualized versus 12.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EIPX -15.4% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both EIPX and IVV?
EIPX and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.32, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EIPX and IVV?
40.4% of EIPX's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 4.3% of IVV's is in holdings EIPX also owns. They hold 42 positions in common, counted across the 89 positions we hold weights for in EIPX and 506 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, EIPX or IVV?
EIPX yields 2.89% while IVV yields 1.10%, so EIPX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than EIPX?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EIPX led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y and the full window. EIPX is less concentrated, with 37.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 38.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.