EIPX vs VTI
FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, EIPX or VTI?
Each has led over a different period.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EIPX led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EIPX | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $575M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.89% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 174 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +24.60%Best | +13.02% |
| 1Y Return | +30.77%Best | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.80% | +21.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.3% | 13.2%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -15.4%Best | -19.3% |
| $10,000 over 3.9 years | $18,539 | $21,153Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.4% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2022 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 3, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.9 years).
EIPX vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.
EIPX vs VTI Performance
FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EIPX returned +30.77% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, EIPX is up 24.60% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, EIPX compounded at +18.80% per year against +21.97% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +21.18% annualized vs +17.15%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EIPX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.3% compared with 13.2% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.4% for EIPX and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.35. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EIPX charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EIPX currently yields 2.89% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
59.6% of EIPX's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 4.2% of VTI's money is in holdings EIPX also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
64 positions in common, counted across the 89 positions we hold weights for in EIPX and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 174 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,095 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for EIPX (93.4% of the fund), and 12 for EIPX that do not appear in VTI (31.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EIPX | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 3.47% | 0.90% | 2.57% |
| NFGNational Fuel Gas Co | 3.24% | 0.01% | 3.23% |
| KMIKinder Morgan Inc./de | 2.50% | 0.08% | 2.42% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 2.47% | 0.08% | 2.39% |
| BKRBaker Hughes A Ge Company | 1.78% | 0.09% | 1.69% |
| SOSouthern Co. | 1.74% | 0.13% | 1.61% |
| SRESempra Common Stock | 1.78% | 0.07% | 1.71% |
| DUKDuke Energy Corp | 1.48% | 0.13% | 1.35% |
| RRCRange Resources Corp | 1.53% | 0.01% | 1.52% |
| 0RMV:LNTechnipfmc Plc Ordinary Shares | 1.50% | 0.04% | 1.46% |
59.6% of EIPX is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EIPX or VTI?
EIPX has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EIPX or VTI?
Over the past year EIPX returned +30.77% vs +16.63% for VTI, so EIPX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), EIPX annualized +17.15% vs +21.18% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EIPX or VTI?
EIPX has been the more volatile fund at 13.3% annualized versus 13.2% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EIPX -15.4% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both EIPX and VTI?
EIPX and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.35, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EIPX and VTI?
59.6% of EIPX's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 4.2% of VTI's is in holdings EIPX also owns. They hold 64 positions in common, counted across the 89 positions we hold weights for in EIPX and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, EIPX or VTI?
EIPX yields 2.89% while VTI yields 1.06%, so EIPX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than EIPX?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EIPX led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.