EIPX vs VYM
FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Which is better, EIPX or VYM?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
VYM has a lower expense ratio. EIPX led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EIPX | VYM |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.04%Best |
| AUM | $575M | $78.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.89% | 2.37% |
| Holdings | 174 | 608 |
| YTD Return | +24.60%Best | +11.83% |
| 1Y Return | +30.77%Best | +15.96% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.80%Best | +18.60% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.3% | 11.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -15.4% | -14.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.9 years | $18,539Best | $16,864 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.4% | 25.8%Best |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2022 | Nov 10, 2006 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 3, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.9 years).
EIPX vs VYM growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.
EIPX vs VYM Performance
FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EIPX returned +30.77% while VYM returned +15.96%. Year to date, EIPX is up 24.60% versus a gain of 11.83% for VYM.
Over three years, EIPX compounded at +18.80% per year against +18.60% for VYM. Across the full 4-year window we track, EIPX has the edge at +17.15% annualized vs +14.34%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EIPX has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.3% compared with 11.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.4% for EIPX and -14.5% for VYM. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.73. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EIPX charges 0.95% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $4 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EIPX currently yields 2.89% against 2.37% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
49.8% of EIPX's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 10.9% of VYM's money is in holdings EIPX also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
48 positions in common, counted across the 89 positions we hold weights for in EIPX and 602 in VYM, against full books of 174 and 608.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 525 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for EIPX (86.9% of the fund), and 27 for EIPX that do not appear in VYM (39.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EIPX | Weight in VYM | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 3.47% | 2.70% | 0.77% |
| NFGNational Fuel Gas Co | 3.24% | 0.03% | 3.21% |
| KMIKinder Morgan Inc./de | 2.50% | 0.25% | 2.25% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 2.47% | 0.24% | 2.23% |
| SOSouthern Co. | 1.74% | 0.40% | 1.34% |
| BKRBaker Hughes A Ge Company | 1.78% | 0.25% | 1.53% |
| SRESempra Common Stock | 1.78% | 0.22% | 1.56% |
| DUKDuke Energy Corp | 1.48% | 0.38% | 1.10% |
| SLBSchlumberger Nv. | 1.29% | 0.36% | 0.93% |
| EOGEog Resources Inc | 1.31% | 0.31% | 1.00% |
49.8% of EIPX is already inside VYM.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EIPX or VYM?
EIPX has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $91 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EIPX or VYM?
Over the past year EIPX returned +30.77% vs +15.96% for VYM, so EIPX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), EIPX annualized +17.15% vs +14.34% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EIPX or VYM?
EIPX has been the more volatile fund at 13.3% annualized versus 11.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: EIPX -15.4% vs VYM -14.5%.
Should I hold both EIPX and VYM?
EIPX and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.73, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EIPX and VYM?
49.8% of EIPX's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 10.9% of VYM's is in holdings EIPX also owns. They hold 48 positions in common, counted across the 89 positions we hold weights for in EIPX and 602 in VYM.
Which pays a higher dividend, EIPX or VYM?
EIPX yields 2.89% while VYM yields 2.37%, so EIPX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VYM better than EIPX?
VYM has a lower expense ratio. EIPX led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. VYM is less concentrated, with 25.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.