EIPX vs SCHD
FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, EIPX or SCHD?
Large Cap Blend against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. EIPX led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. EIPX is less concentrated, with 37.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EIPX | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $575M | $111.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 2.89% | 3.24% |
| Holdings | 174 | 206 |
| YTD Return | +24.60%Best | +24.55% |
| 1Y Return | +30.77%Best | +29.85% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.80%Best | +16.64% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.54% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.3%Best | 13.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -15.4%Best | -16.1% |
| $10,000 over 3.9 years | $18,539Best | $16,118 |
| Top 10 Weight | 37.4%Best | 41.6% |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Nov 2, 2022 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 3, 2022 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.9 years).
EIPX vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.9 years both funds cover.
EIPX vs SCHD Performance
FT Energy Income Partners Strategy ETF (EIPX) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year EIPX returned +30.77% while SCHD returned +29.85%. Year to date, EIPX is up 24.60% versus a gain of 24.55% for SCHD.
Over three years, EIPX compounded at +18.80% per year against +16.64% for SCHD. Across the full 4-year window we track, EIPX has the edge at +17.15% annualized vs +13.02%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
SCHD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.5% compared with 13.3% for EIPX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -15.4% for EIPX and -16.1% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.78. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EIPX charges 0.95% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $6 annually, a gap of $89 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EIPX currently yields 2.89% against 3.24% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
6.1% of EIPX's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 5.7% of SCHD's money is in holdings EIPX also owns.
EIPX and SCHD share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 89 positions we hold weights for in EIPX and 98 in SCHD, against full books of 174 and 206.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 92 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for EIPX (94.0% of the fund), and 70 for EIPX that do not appear in SCHD (83.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EIPX and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EIPX or SCHD?
EIPX has an expense ratio of 0.95% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $89 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EIPX or SCHD?
Over the past year EIPX returned +30.77% vs +29.85% for SCHD, so EIPX leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), EIPX annualized +17.15% vs +13.02% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EIPX or SCHD?
SCHD has been the more volatile fund at 13.5% annualized versus 13.3% for EIPX. Worst drawdown: EIPX -15.4% vs SCHD -16.1%.
Should I hold both EIPX and SCHD?
EIPX and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.78, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EIPX and SCHD?
6.1% of EIPX's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 5.7% of SCHD's is in holdings EIPX also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 89 positions we hold weights for in EIPX and 98 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, EIPX or SCHD?
EIPX yields 2.89% while SCHD yields 3.24%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than EIPX?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. EIPX led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. EIPX is less concentrated, with 37.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.