GINC vs LSCP
Goldman Sachs Income ETF vs Natixis Loomis Sayles Dynamic Core Plus ETF
Which is better, GINC or LSCP?
LSCP costs less.
LSCP has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | GINC | LSCP |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% | 0.39%Best |
| AUM | $211M | $50M |
| Dividend Yield | 0.60% | 0.90% |
| Holdings | 129 | 408 |
| YTD Return | -2.09%Best | -3.81% |
| Fund Family | Goldman Sachs Asset Management | Natixis Funds |
| Category | Fixed Income | Fixed Income |
| Inception | Dec 3, 2019 | Jun 24, 2026 |
Not shown on this pair: 1Y Return, 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight, Style.
GINC vs LSCP growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
GINC vs LSCP Performance
Goldman Sachs Income ETF (GINC) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and Natixis Loomis Sayles Dynamic Core Plus ETF (LSCP) is an ETF from Natixis Funds. Year to date, GINC is down 2.09% versus a loss of 3.81% for LSCP.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
GINC charges 0.40% per year while LSCP charges 0.39%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $39 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GINC currently yields 0.60% against 0.90% for LSCP.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 129 holdings in GINC and 31 in LSCP, totalling 88.6% and 4.5% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 129 positions we hold weights for in GINC and 31 in LSCP, against full books of 129 and 408.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of GINC and LSCP you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, GINC or LSCP?
GINC has an expense ratio of 0.40% while LSCP charges 0.39%. LSCP is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, GINC or LSCP?
GINC yields 0.60% while LSCP yields 0.90%, so LSCP currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is LSCP better than GINC?
LSCP has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.