GINC vs SECU

GINC vs SECU

Which is better, GINC or SECU?

GINC has been ahead.

GINC has a lower expense ratio. GINC led over 1Y.

Lower Fees: GINCHigher Returns (1Y): GINC

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricGINCSECU
Expense Ratio0.40%Best0.41%
AUM$211M$823M
Dividend Yield0.60%3.45%
Holdings129946
YTD Return-2.09%Best-2.94%
1Y Return--2.94%
Fund FamilyGoldman Sachs Asset ManagementiShares by BlackRock (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeFixed Income
InceptionDec 3, 2019Jan 23, 2026

Not shown on this pair: 3Y Return (annualized), 5Y Return (annualized), Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight, Style.

GINC vs SECU growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

Compare GINC against instead:GINC vs SPYGINC vs QQQGINC vs VOOGINC vs VTISECU against:SECU vs VXUS

GINC vs SECU Performance

Goldman Sachs Income ETF (GINC) is an ETF from Goldman Sachs Asset Management and iShares Securitized Income Active ETF (SECU) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Year to date, GINC is down 2.09% versus a loss of 2.94% for SECU.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

GINC charges 0.40% per year while SECU charges 0.41%. On a $10,000 position that is $40 vs $41 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, GINC currently yields 0.60% against 3.45% for SECU.

Holdings Overlap

We hold position weights for 129 holdings in GINC and 108 in SECU, totalling 88.6% and 17.4% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.

0 positions in common, counted across the 129 positions we hold weights for in GINC and 108 in SECU, against full books of 129 and 946.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of GINC and SECU you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

GINCSECU

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, GINC or SECU?

GINC has an expense ratio of 0.40% while SECU charges 0.41%. GINC is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which pays a higher dividend, GINC or SECU?

GINC yields 0.60% while SECU yields 3.45%, so SECU currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SECU better than GINC?

GINC has a lower expense ratio. GINC led over 1Y. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.