PTL vs PWRD
Inspire 500 ETF vs TCW Transform Systems ETF
Which is better, PTL or PWRD?
Each has led over a different period.
PTL has a lower expense ratio. PTL led over 1Y, PWRD over the full window. PTL is less concentrated, with 28.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | PTL | PWRD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.09%Best | 0.75% |
| AUM | $892M | $1.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.94% | 0.06% |
| Holdings | 941 | 56 |
| YTD Return | +9.62%Best | +3.29% |
| 1Y Return | +10.17%Best | +2.06% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.66% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.2%Best | 22.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.7%Best | -25.9% |
| $10,000 over 2.6 years | $14,110 | $15,280Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 28.0%Best | 50.6% |
| Fund Family | Inspire ETFs | TCW ETFs |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Mar 25, 2024 | Feb 2, 2022 |
Not shown on this pair: 5Y Return (annualized).
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Mar 26, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.6 years).
PTL vs PWRD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.6 years both funds cover.
PTL vs PWRD Performance
Inspire 500 ETF (PTL) is an ETF from Inspire ETFs and TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) is an ETF from TCW ETFs. Over the past year PTL returned +10.17% while PWRD returned +2.06%. Year to date, PTL is up 9.62% versus a gain of 3.29% for PWRD.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
PWRD has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.7% compared with 13.2% for PTL. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.7% for PTL and -25.9% for PWRD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
PTL charges 0.09% per year while PWRD charges 0.75%. On a $10,000 position that is $9 vs $75 annually, a gap of $66 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, PTL currently yields 0.94% against 0.06% for PWRD.
Holdings Overlap
25.4% of PTL's money is in holdings PWRD also owns. 58.8% of PWRD's money is in holdings PTL also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
16 positions in common, counted across the 501 positions we hold weights for in PTL and 28 in PWRD, against full books of 941 and 56.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 6 positions for PWRD that do not appear in our book for PTL (22.6% of the fund), and 479 for PTL that do not appear in PWRD (73.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in PTL | Weight in PWRD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 10.05% | 3.79% | 6.26% |
| GEGeneral Electric Co. | 1.95% | 8.02% | 6.07% |
| XOMExxonmobil Corp. | 3.79% | 3.35% | 0.44% |
| ANETArista Networks Inc Common Stock | 1.42% | 5.72% | 4.30% |
| KLACKla-tencor | 1.49% | 5.32% | 3.83% |
| VGVenture Global, Inc. | 0.22% | 5.10% | 4.88% |
| GEVGe Vernova, Inc. | 1.52% | 3.56% | 2.04% |
| VRTVertiv Holdings Co | 0.66% | 3.89% | 3.23% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 2.22% | 1.97% | 0.25% |
| PWRQuanta Services Inc | 0.57% | 3.25% | 2.68% |
58.8% of PWRD is already inside PTL.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, PTL or PWRD?
PTL has an expense ratio of 0.09% while PWRD charges 0.75%. PTL is the cheaper option, by $66 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, PTL or PWRD?
Over the past year PTL returned +10.17% vs +2.06% for PWRD, so PTL leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, PTL or PWRD?
PWRD has been the more volatile fund at 22.7% annualized versus 13.2% for PTL. Worst drawdown: PTL -19.7% vs PWRD -25.9%.
Should I hold both PTL and PWRD?
PTL and PWRD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between PTL and PWRD?
58.8% of PWRD's money is in holdings PTL also owns. 58.8% of PWRD's is in holdings PTL also owns. They hold 16 positions in common, counted across the 501 positions we hold weights for in PTL and 28 in PWRD.
Which pays a higher dividend, PTL or PWRD?
PTL yields 0.94% while PWRD yields 0.06%, so PTL currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is PWRD better than PTL?
PTL has a lower expense ratio. PTL led over 1Y, PWRD over the full window. PTL is less concentrated, with 28.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 50.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.