QSIX vs QTEC
Pacer Metaurus Nasdaq-100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF vs First Trust NASDAQ-100-Technology Sector Index Fund
Which is better, QSIX or QTEC?
Nearly the same fund. QTEC costs less.
QTEC has a lower expense ratio. QTEC led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | QSIX | QTEC |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.60% | 0.55%Best |
| AUM | $22M | $4.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.60% | 0.01% |
| Holdings | 107 | 96 |
| YTD Return | +17.19% | +34.85%Best |
| 1Y Return | +20.19% | +35.82%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +27.88% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.05% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.5%Best | 27.9% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.5%Best | -29.0% |
| $10,000 over 2.1 years | $14,995 | $16,705Best |
| Fund Family | Pacer ETFs | First Trust Portfolios (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Sep 23, 2024 | Apr 19, 2006 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 2.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 24, 2024 to Oct 14, 2026 (2.1 years).
QSIX vs QTEC growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 2.1 years both funds cover.
QSIX vs QTEC Performance
Pacer Metaurus Nasdaq-100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) is an ETF from Pacer ETFs and First Trust NASDAQ-100-Technology Sector Index Fund (QTEC) is an ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US). Over the past year QSIX returned +20.19% while QTEC returned +35.82%. Year to date, QSIX is up 17.19% versus a gain of 34.85% for QTEC.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QTEC has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 27.9% compared with 16.5% for QSIX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.5% for QSIX and -29.0% for QTEC. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.95. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
QSIX charges 0.60% per year while QTEC charges 0.55%. On a $10,000 position that is $60 vs $55 annually, a gap of $5 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, QSIX currently yields 3.60% against 0.01% for QTEC.
Holdings Overlap
At least 95.6% of QTEC's money is in holdings QSIX also owns.
Stated as a floor: for QSIX, our book for it covers 93.0% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
Most of QTEC is already inside QSIX. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
45 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in QSIX and 47 in QTEC, against full books of 107 and 96.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in QSIX | Weight in QTEC | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 7.96% | 2.15% | 5.81% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 6.72% | 2.13% | 4.59% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 5.42% | 2.07% | 3.35% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 4.50% | 2.27% | 2.23% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. | 4.04% | 2.73% | 1.31% |
| METAMeta Platform Inc | 3.03% | 2.58% | 0.45% |
| INTCIntel Corp. | 2.25% | 2.70% | 0.45% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.47% | 1.94% | 0.53% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 1.60% | 2.39% | 0.79% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp|109 | 1.59% | 2.34% | 0.75% |
95.6% of QTEC is already inside QSIX.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, QSIX or QTEC?
QSIX has an expense ratio of 0.60% while QTEC charges 0.55%. QTEC is the cheaper option, by $5 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, QSIX or QTEC?
Over the past year QSIX returned +20.19% vs +35.82% for QTEC, so QTEC leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (2 years), QSIX annualized +21.28% vs +27.68% for QTEC. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, QSIX or QTEC?
QTEC has been the more volatile fund at 27.9% annualized versus 16.5% for QSIX. Worst drawdown: QSIX -19.5% vs QTEC -29.0%.
Should I hold both QSIX and QTEC?
QSIX and QTEC have a monthly-return correlation of 0.95, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between QSIX and QTEC?
At least 95.6% of QTEC's money is in holdings QSIX also owns. Our book for QSIX is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 45 positions in common, counted across the 100 positions we hold weights for in QSIX and 47 in QTEC.
Which pays a higher dividend, QSIX or QTEC?
QSIX yields 3.60% while QTEC yields 0.01%, so QSIX currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QTEC better than QSIX?
QTEC has a lower expense ratio. QTEC led over 1Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.95. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.