SMHC vs VTI
VanEck China Semiconductor ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, SMHC or VTI?
VTI costs less.
VTI has a lower expense ratio.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | SMHC | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $14M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 57 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | -37.22% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +16.63% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.97% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 23, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window, Top 10 Weight.
SMHC vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
SMHC vs VTI Performance
VanEck China Semiconductor ETF (SMHC) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, SMHC is down 37.22% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
SMHC charges 0.65% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, SMHC currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 25 holdings in SMHC and 3,441 in VTI, totalling 94.0% and 98.1% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 25 positions we hold weights for in SMHC and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 57 and 3,524.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of SMHC and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, SMHC or VTI?
SMHC has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which pays a higher dividend, SMHC or VTI?
SMHC yields 0.00% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than SMHC?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.