TGLR vs VTI
Wedbush LAFFER | TENGLER New Era Value ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, TGLR or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | TGLR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.85% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $36M | $689.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.96% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 33 | 3,524 |
| YTD Return | +7.98% | +13.02%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.91% | +16.63%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.41% | +21.97%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +11.99% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 12.7%Best | 13.1% |
| Max Drawdown | -19.8% | -19.3%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $16,952 | $17,767Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 44.2% | 33.5%Best |
| Fund Family | Wedbush Funds | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Apr 13, 2026 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 28, 2023 to Oct 14, 2026 (3.1 years).
TGLR vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
TGLR vs VTI Performance
Wedbush LAFFER | TENGLER New Era Value ETF (TGLR) is an ETF from Wedbush Funds and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year TGLR returned +11.91% while VTI returned +16.63%. Year to date, TGLR is up 7.98% versus a gain of 13.02% for VTI.
Over three years, TGLR compounded at +20.41% per year against +21.97% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 13.1% compared with 12.7% for TGLR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -19.8% for TGLR and -19.3% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.94. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
TGLR charges 0.85% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $85 vs $3 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, TGLR currently yields 0.96% against 1.06% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
96.3% of TGLR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 38.1% of VTI's money is in holdings TGLR also owns.
Most of TGLR is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
28 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in TGLR and 3,441 in VTI, against full books of 33 and 3,524.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,128 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for TGLR (59.4% of the fund), and 1 for TGLR that do not appear in VTI (1.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in TGLR | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 4.18% | 6.88% | 2.70% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.11% | 5.11% | 0.00% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.25% | 6.30% | 3.05% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 3.52% | 3.41% | 0.11% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.41% | 2.38% | 2.03% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 3.61% | 2.70% | 0.91% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 4.51% | 1.29% | 3.22% |
| LRCXLam Research Corp | 5.19% | 0.51% | 4.68% |
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 4.54% | 0.61% | 3.93% |
| AXPAmerican Express Co. | 4.61% | 0.24% | 4.37% |
96.3% of TGLR is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, TGLR or VTI?
TGLR has an expense ratio of 0.85% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, TGLR or VTI?
Over the past year TGLR returned +11.91% vs +16.63% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, TGLR or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 13.1% annualized versus 12.7% for TGLR. Worst drawdown: TGLR -19.8% vs VTI -19.3%.
Should I hold both TGLR and VTI?
TGLR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.94, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between TGLR and VTI?
96.3% of TGLR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 38.1% of VTI's is in holdings TGLR also owns. They hold 28 positions in common, counted across the 30 positions we hold weights for in TGLR and 3,441 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, TGLR or VTI?
TGLR yields 0.96% while VTI yields 1.06%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than TGLR?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.94. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 44.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.